I think you missed the comparison. Hitler is Obama. The pro-abortion but anti-Holocaust close competitor is Romney. The pure-as-the-driven snow but impossible to elect Corrie Ten Boom is Virgil Goode (hypothetically, or name whatever candidate you consider “pure” enough).
I’m saying would you vote for Corrie Ten Boon, trusting that God would protect the millions of people that Hitler has already shown that he will kill if re-elected..... or would you vote for the flawed (pro-abortion) candidate who could beat Hitler and ensure that the Holocaust didn’t happen?
You could even say that the candidate opposing Hitler is a pro-abortion, anti-Jew, anti-handicapped, white supremacist but he doesn’t support the Holocaust.
See the big difference about Obama is that he is not American; he doesn’t believe in or support any of the things that have made America exceptional - specifically the system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and the rule of law rather than the rule of men. We will always have crooks who want to rule. We will always have fallen people with stupid ideas. That’s a given, and that fits both Obama and Romney - as well as anybody who has been in Washington DC for very long. That’s because power corrupts.
The solution that our Founders came up with is a SYSTEM of accountability. And that system is what Obama is attacking with every ounce of his being, and what Romney has not been attacking.
A white supremacist might morally be a jerk, but if he still administers justice fairly he is a darned sight better than a Hitler, who throws out the rule of law and rules by executive order according to his own personal whims. Romney is flawed but he is not a lawless, anti-American, foreign enemy combatant like Obama has clearly demonstrated that he is.