IMO, ONLY proof of a foreign birth combined with criminal fraud in forging documents to cover it up would (will, IMO!) result in Barry's removal from office.
The Congressional Research (whatever) already has made the case based on Marguet-Pillado case dicta that Barry is a “citizen at birth” and thus a “natural-born citizen” even if born in a foreign country as long as he has a biological relationship to a US citizen. Therefore, only criminal actions could defeat eligibility. Even then Barry could claim, OK I lied about where I was born, but I am still eligible under Marguet-Pillado.
See my FR vanity thread:
"Obama cites US v Marguet-Pillado. Dicta implies Obama eligible even if born in Kenya"
We can conclude after over 4 years that the US judiciary will dishonestly misconstrue again and again and ignore past Supreme Court Opinions about natural born citizens. They are psychologically flawed, especially when they are political cases that concern the left and Obama. We see it time after time.
US v. Marguet-Pillado "dicta" does not overcome these Supreme Court cases that conclude natural born citizen and their holdings.
For many examples.
1814 The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch
1830 Shanks v. Dupont, 28 1830 Inglis v. Sailors’ Snug Harbor
1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford, as an example, where it cites Vattel directly:
“The citizens are the members of the civil society, bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority; they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights.”
Again:
“I say, to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen, for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to settle and stay in the country.”
Enough of snippets to keep this post short. ...
To continue Supreme Court cases that honestly understand natural born citizens:
1872 Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S.
1875 Minor v. Happersett
1884 Elk v. Wilkins
1939, Elg v. Perkins
1964 Schneider v. Rusk
We know they are dead wrong and they know it too. These Supreme Court cases, in totality, above prove it.