Posted on 06/27/2012 7:55:04 AM PDT by Sasparilla
A Muslim mob shouting “Allahu Akbar!” erupts and stones Christians in Dearborn injuring the protesters. The mob threw stones, trash and crates at the Christian demonstrators. This is crazy! Via Joe Miller: (Stone throwing begins at 9:00 minutes) http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/06/omg-muslims-shouting-allahu-akbar-stone-christians-in-dearborn-michigan-video/
Laws are selectively enforced in America. Muzzies are given a pass here. It’s in your face to Christians.
Forget about either side. The cops witnessed assaults being committed on the Christians and failed to apprehend. They should be charged with ‘dereliction of duty’ or whatever laws relevant to failing to ‘protect and serve’. It’s all right there in the video. Interesting that the cut on the lead guy’s forehead ended up bleeding in the shape of the cross.
re: “Forget about either side. The cops witnessed assaults being committed on the Christians and failed to apprehend. They should be charged with ‘dereliction of duty’ or whatever laws relevant to failing to ‘protect and serve’.”
You’re absolutely right!
ARE YOU ON CRACK OR SOMETHING?
Bull Sheeeet!
This is the UNITED STATES of America and the last time I checked the 1st Amend did NOT specify that "Freedom of Speech and Assembly" would ONLY apply to those who were NOT "Christians."
DID YOU EVEN BOTHER WATCHING THE VID?
Obviously, NOT or you would not be making such an idiotic and asinine statement!
Are you an atheist? An Agnostic? A closet Moose-limb?
Or perhaps a "Secular Progressive," here posing as a "Conservative?"
I had better quit before I say something which will get me banned for life!!!
SHARIA IN EUROPE TODAY
WHEN ONE GAZES UPON ISLAM IN EUROPE TODAY, YOU ARE SEEING AMERICA IN 20 YEARS OR LESS....Much LESS if B. Hussein Obama is reelected.
WHY? THE ACTIONS BY MUSLIMS IN EUROPE ARE BASED ON SHARIA LAW, THE SAME SHARIA LAW THAT IS BEGINNING TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN AMERICA TODAY.
THERE ARE TIMES WHEN TRAFFIC CANNOT MOVE IN LONDON STREETS AS MUSLIMS COMMANDEER THE STREETS TO PRAY—A POLITICAL RESULT BASED ON SHARIA LAW.
ENTIRE AREAS OF EUROPE ARE NO-GO ZONES FOR NON-MUSLIMS, THIS INCLUDES THE POLICE. THESE ARE ISLAMIC ENCLAVES WHERE ONLY MUSLIMS LIVE. THE MUSLIM-ONLY POLICY IS BASED ON SHARIA.
IN ENGLAND AN ANGLICAN BISHOP CALLS FOR THE RULE OF ISLAMIC LAW FOR MUSLIMS. THE BISHOP IS OBEYING SHARIA LAW.
IN THE SCHOOLS ONLY ISLAMIC APPROVED TEXTS CAN BE USED; THIS IS BASED ON SHARIA LAW.
CHRISTIANS MAY NOT SPEAK TO MUSLIMS ABOUT CHRISTIANITY NOR MAY CHRISTIANS HAND OUT LITERATURE. THIS IS A POLITICAL RESULT BASED ON SHARIA LAW ENFORCED BY BRITISH COURTS.
RAPE BY MUSLIMS IS SO PREVALENT IN PARTS OF SWEDEN THAT SWEDEN HAS FORBIDDEN THE POLICE FROM COLLECTING ANY DATA IN THE RAPE INVESTIGATION THAT WOULD POINT TO ISLAM. RAPE IS PART OF ISLAMIC DOCTRINE AS APPLIED TO NON-MUSLIM WOMEN.
IN LONDON, MASS DEMONSTRATIONS BY MUSLIMS CALL FOR THE END OF BRITISH LAW AND SHARIA LAW TO RULE ALL PEOPLE, REGARDLESS OF RELIGION. THIS POLITICAL ACTION IS BASED ON SHARIA.
IN SOME ENGLISH HOSPITALS DURING RAMADAN FAST (AN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EVENT), NON-MUSLIMS CANNOT EAT WHERE A MUSLIM CAN SEE THEM. THE SUBMISSION OF NON-MUSLIMS TO ISLAMIC PREFERENCES IS BASED ON SHARIA LAW.
AT BRITISH HOSPITALS, MUSLIM WOMEN ARE TREATED ONLY AS SHARIA LAW DEMANDS.
SHARIA IN AMERICA TODAY
HERE ARE CURRENT AND HISTORICAL EVENTS IN AMERICA THAT ARE DRIVEN BY SHARIA LAW:
ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 JIHADISTS ATTACKED AND DESTROYED THE WORLD TRADE CENTER IN NEW YORK. THIS ATROCITY WAS IN COMPLIANCE TO THE DOCTRINE OF JIHAD FOUND IN THE SHARIA LAW. THE ATTACK WAS A POLITICAL ACTION MOTIVATED BY A RELIGIOUS MANDATE FOR ENDLESS JIHAD.
TEXTBOOKS IN AMERICA MUST BE APPROVED BY ISLAMIC COUNCILS. THIS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SHARIA LAW.
AMERICAN EMPLOYERS AND SCHOOLS ARE MET WITH DEMANDS FOR TIME AND SPACE TO DO ISLAMIC PRAYER. THESE DEMANDS ARE BASED ON SHARIA LAW.
THE AMERICAN BANKING SYSTEM IS BECOMING ISLAMICIZED WITH SHARIA FINANCING. OUR BANKING SYSTEM IS BECOMING SHARIA COMPLIANT IN FINANCIAL LAW, BUT IS IGNORANT ABOUT THE TOTALITY OF SHARIA LAW.
UNIVERSITIES ARE ASKED TO PROVIDE SEXUALLY SEGREGATED SWIMMING POOLS AND OTHER ATHLETIC FACILITIES FOR MUSLIM WOMEN.
HOSPITALS ARE BEING SUED FOR NOT PROVIDING SHARIA COMPLIANT TREATMENT.
NO COURSE AT THE COLLEGE LEVEL USES CRITICAL THINKING REGARDING THE HISTORY AND DOCTRINE OF ISLAM. UNDER SHARIA NOTHING ABOUT ISLAM MAY BE CRITICIZED.
MUSLIM CHARITIES GIVE MONEY TO JIHADISTS (ISLAMIC TERRORISTS), AS PER SHARIA LAW.
MUSLIM FOOT-BATHS ARE BEING INSTALLED IN AIRPORT FACILITIES, PAID FOR BY AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS. THIS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SHARIA LAW.
AMERICAN PRISONS ARE A STRONGHOLD OF ISLAMIC PROSELYTIZING.
FIORKPLACES ARE BEING MADE ISLAMIC WORSHIP SITES THROUGH SPECIAL ROOMS AND TIME OFF TO PRAY. THIS IS IN ACCORDANCE TO SHARIA LAW.
ISLAMIC REFUGEES BRING ALL OF THEIR WIVES FOR WELFARE AND MEDICAL TREATMENT TO AMERICA. AMERICAN AUTHORITIES WILL NOT ACT—EVEN WHEN PRESENTED WITH EVIDENCE. POLYGAMY IS PURE SHARIA.
FIE ARE FI GHTING WARS IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN TO IMPLEMENT CONSTITUTIONS WHOSE FI RST ARTICLE IS THE SUPREMACY OF SHARIA LAW.
WHY DO WE NEED TO KNOW SHARIA?
ISLAMIC SCHOLARS CLAIM: ISLAMIC LAW IS PERFECT, UNIVERSAL AND ETERNAL. THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES ARE TEMPORARY, LIMITED AND WILL PASS AWAY. IT IS THE DUTY OF EVERY MUSLIM TO OBEY THE LAWS OF ALLAH, THE SHARIA. SHARIA LAW FOR THE NON-MUSLIM
LAWS ARE MAN-MADE; WHILE SHARIA LAW IS SACRED AND COMES FROM THE ONLY LEGITIMATE GOD, ALLAH.
SHARIA: SHARIA IS BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES FOUND IN THE KORAN AND OTHER ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS⁄POLITICAL TEXTS. THERE ARE NO COMMON PRINCIPLES BETWEEN AMERICAN LAW AND SHARIA.
UNDER SHARIA LAW:
THERE IS NO FREEDOM OF RELIGION
THERE IS NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH
THERE IS NO FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
THERE IS NO FREEDOM OF ARTISTIC EXPRESSION
THERE IS NO FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
THERE IS NO EQUALITY OF PEOPLES—A NON-MUSLIM, A KAFI R, IS NEVER EQUAL TO A MUSLIM
THERE IS NO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER SHARIA FOR DIFFERENT CLASSES OF PEOPLE. JUSTICE IS DUALISTIC, WITH ONE SET OF LAWS FOR MUSLIM MALES AND DIFFERENT LAWS FOR WOMEN AND NON-MUSLIMS.
THERE ARE NO EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN
WOMEN CAN BE BEATEN
A NON-MUSLIM CANNOT BEAR ARMS
THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY, SINCE DEMOCRACY MEANS THAT A NON-MUSLIM IS EQUAL TO A MUSLIM
OUR CONSTITUTION IS A MAN-MADE DOCUMENT OF IGNORANCE, JAHILIYAH, THAT MUST SUBMIT TO SHARIA
NON-MUSLIMS ARE DHIMMIS, THIRD-CLASS CITIZENS
ALL GOVERNMENTS MUST BE RULED BY SHARIA LAW
UNLIKE COMMON LAW, SHARIA IS NOT INTERPRETIVE, NOR CAN IT BE CHANGED
REMEMBER: THERE IS NO GOLDEN RULE IN ISLAM!!!
I see people all the time who feel the need to carry such signs, distribute tracts, etc. in crowded places; this has not been unusual throughout history and as long as they're not violent it is their right to do so even though I may not agree with their message. As long as they're not violent it is their right to do so.
If one inflicts violence toward someone who has not been violent in the least they need to be AT THE LEAST reprimanded.
This really should not be difficult to understand.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Anyone know who has the Michigan ping list?
bttt
bump
ping
You are correct. My error in using the word confronted. What I meant was he aggressively butted heads with them.
All others he approached in love.....especially sinners like the woman at the well......with candor and honesty, exposing their real issues - but never like he did the Jewish leaders.
Those who knew they were sinners, He approached with grace; Those who knew they were righteous (at least they thought so) he exposed and challenged. Luke 18.
Early after his conversion, Paul argued and confronted. After being sent away for years, and received more revelation from the Lord, and returning to Antioch after Barnabas went to find him, he changed. After he matured, he wrote II Timothy 2:24 - 26.
He was a different man. More Christ-like.
He knew no one is argued into the Kingdom.
I wasn’t there but have read what record we do have thoroughly for almost 50 years..
I agree with everything you said. I was only pointing out that their methodology contradicted their message....but hey, that’s been going on in Christianity for at least 1,900 years.....
If the police obviously did not do their job, causing harm to any individual, then they should be sued. If the case is lost because of Muslim prejudice, it would then need to be appealed.
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.