Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny

OK, I’ll type slow for you:

Two people are running for an office. There are 4 people in the electorate.

Persons 1-2 vote for Candidate o. Person 3 votes for candidate R. Person 4 writes in “Sarah Palin.”

Who wins the election? What is the result of Person 4’s tantrum vote?

Simple arithmetic.

obama thanks you and yours for the vote for him. You can play word games until the cows come home, but a tantrum “I’ll just eat worms” vote is THE SAME AS a vote for obama (there, I tightened up that little word game you have played on so many responses here).

We have exactly 2 choices: obama or Romney. There is no 3rd option. If you do not vote for Romney, you increase the % of votes going to obama.

Period.


209 posted on 06/25/2012 2:35:03 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Guns Walked -- People Died -- Holder Lied -- Obama Golfed (thanks, Secret Agent Man))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003
We have exactly 2 choices: obama or Romney.

Wrong again. We have (unless there's a miracle, and they do happen) exactly 1 of 2 outcomes: Obama or Romney.

We have many choices, including the choice to reject both of them and vote third party -- if one in three Americans do that, the winner will get in on such a putrid plurality that he will go into office and face the nation and the world with it on record that nearly two of every three American voters rejected him.

Your arithmetic is screwy.

212 posted on 06/25/2012 4:02:42 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson