Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk; Norm Lenhart; xzins; SoConPubbie
I can't address all your posts, sorry, so I'll try again.

I've asked over and over and get the same answer to my question. Is this the most destructive, the most pro-death, pro-Marxist, pro-muzzie, pro-gay, anti-Christian, anti-free enterprise, anti-American, anti-everything we all love about this country admninistration ever?

You all would answer: yes, yes it is.

I'm sorry, working in a manner to reelect this atrocity of a group is beyond the thinkable, yet here I am speaking to a group that wants to do just that.

You all seem to think you're smarter and more righteous and pure than every candidate you once supported, every great warrior talk show host and conservative journalist, each of whom have taken the ABO pledge, each of whom will support this nominee (who shall remain nameless), because they understand we cannot have this man and his minions in office another four years.

If you truly answer yes to my question (and all of you do), there is no other action that is sane or right than to get rid of these people.

Pretending the GOP candidate who shall not be named is the same as the most destructive, the most pro-death, pro-Marxist, pro-muzzie, pro-gay, anti-Christian, anti-free enterprise, anti-American, anti-everything we all love about this country admninistration ever is as fatuous, unfounded and silly as claiming Mitt is a conservative. Working against him will get you nothing but chains as this man goes full Hugo Chavez on us if you help him get elected.

There are only two people who can win this election, get over it, get real, and stop trying to reelect the most destructive, the most pro-death, pro-Marxist, pro-muzzie, pro-gay, anti-Christian, anti-free enterprise, anti-American, anti-everything we all love about this country admninistration ever

It demeans you all.

92 posted on 06/19/2012 8:23:25 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt, the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark
the GOP candidate who shall not be named

That was certainly good for a hearty laugh.

94 posted on 06/19/2012 8:45:24 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark; BlackElk; Norm Lenhart; xzins; SoConPubbie
It demeans you all.

No, what demeans you Lakeshark is sacrificing your pinciples on the alter of political expediency and fear of the unknown where Obama is concerned to vote for a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal like Mitt Romney.

My description of Romney is not hyperbole; his own record bears out this statement as an objective truth.

As for me, I am with Alexander Hamilton:

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
98 posted on 06/19/2012 10:13:17 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark; EternalVigilance
If you think that your #92 is an answer to my #86, you must be deaf, dumb and blind. What part of my obligations to God as a Roman Catholic make voting for EITHER Obozo OR Romney. My faith and my God (and each precious infant who would be slaughtered under either of these barbarians) are INFINITELY more valuable than your petty ideological obsessions.

I will not be the square peg to be hammered into your infernal round hole.

I am certainly smarter, more righteous and more pure than any cretin who would be caught alive or dead voting for Robamney. Demeaned??? Not on your life. It is not demeaning to obey my God, obey my Church, be faithful thereafter to my nation and then my customary party and to vote not only No but Hell, NO!!! to both of these despicable barbarians. As you well know, there can be NO effective pro-Romney propagandistic surrender monkey answers to the specifics of #86.

99 posted on 06/19/2012 10:49:25 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark; BlackElk; xzins; SoConPubbie

“You all seem to think you’re smarter and more righteous and pure than every candidate you once supported, every great warrior talk show host and conservative journalist, each of whom have taken the ABO pledge, each of whom will support this nominee (who shall remain nameless), because they understand we cannot have this man and his minions in office another four years.”

As to smarter, definitely. It’s the height of stupidity to vote for/support a liberal and expect to maintain any credibility as a conservative. As to purity, well duh. That’s obvious.

As for demeaning, the only persons demeaned in this are the ones who sacrificed their integrity on an altar of fear. The rest of us are doing just fine.

Spin as you like. The above is a documented fact.


100 posted on 06/20/2012 2:02:55 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark; BlackElk; Norm Lenhart; P-Marlowe; SoConPubbie; cripplecreek; cva66snipe; Elvina; ...

I do not intend to vote for either Obama or Romney. I will instead vote for the conservative candidate, the Constitution Party candidate, Virgil Goode.

What prevents conservatives from voting for a conservative candidate? Fear. In this case, it’s fear of doing something different, because if conservatives did something different, then it just might not work out.

Those who vote for Goode know the numbers. They know that a conservative candidate could win if conservatives were to stick together and support him.

Therefore, the issue is not that there are, as fearful conservatives continue to say, “only 2 candidates in this race.” No, there are at least 4 at this moment: Johnson, Goode, Romney, Obama.

No, the issue is those conservatives who are voting for a radical liberal and pretending to themselves that he is not a radical liberal. It is not possible to go forward by going backward. The truth is that they lose whether they support Romney or Obama, and the nation suffers with either.

Look at Megan McCain, Lake. She is the future of the GOP-E: A radical, leftist, pro-gay, pro-abortion feminist. And she is young and only just starting.

The issue is that conservatives keep doing the GOP-E thing, and they keep getting the GOP-E result.

It’s sad that they could band together around someone who believes like them, but they instead choose to band together around a liberal, and they castigate those conservatives who stay true to their principles.

“We can’t do something different!” they say. “Why, there’s this AntiChrist in charge, and the sky will fall if we do anything different. So...I know we don’t trust the liberal GOP-E,but.... we’re going to trust the liberal GOP-E.”

You have no vision. I understand you perfectly. I smell.....fear.


102 posted on 06/20/2012 2:39:20 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark; xzins

If you truly answer yes to my question (and all of you do), there is no other action that is sane or right than to get rid of these people.

Spot on. There is no other action that is sane or right than to remove these people from office. Full agreement reached. The part you don't understand is that electing Mitt Romney fails to do that. It is, in fact, begging for more of the same. Instead of getting rid of the problem, you are simply re-branding it.

Which is the pro-abortion party again, democrat or republican? Which is the pro-illegal-immigration party again? Which is the pro-unborn-murder party again? Which is the pro-corporate-bailout party? Which is the pro-crony-capitalist party?

If we follow your lead, we're all democrats now. There is no longer a party of protest. We become what we detest and adopt responsibility for the crimes committed.

I'm not a liberal. I am a God-fearing, gun-loving, small government respecting, Constitutional conservative. Anyone and everyone who feels the same way should have serious reservations about voting for Mitt Romney.

I'll vote for Virgil Goode. If the majority does, he'll win. But either way, my conscious will be clean. I won't have to defend my vote before my Maker. I'll sleep better at night, and having done so, I'll be well rested and more ready to deal with *whichever* baby-killing, gun-grabbing, bailout-providing, amnesty-granting, homosexual-advocating, healthcare-ransoming, stimulus-providing president *you* help to elect.


109 posted on 06/20/2012 6:55:12 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson