Posted on 06/11/2012 9:17:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
"All officers of government in this country, in every branch, at every level, have as the first obligation of their sacred oath the protection of all innocent lives within their jurisdiction.
Should I be elected to the office of President of the United States, I will keep my oath.
Justice Blackmun, in Roe vs. Wade, admitted that of course the child in the womb is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, if they are a person.
Since it is self-evident that they are a person, my first act as President, after having sworn the oath, will be to publish a presidential finding to that effect.
My second act will be to ask for the resignation of anyone in the executive branch who will not act accordingly.
My third act will be to order the closing of every abortion facility in the country, as per the explicit, imperative requirement of the Supreme Law of the Land.
'No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.'
'No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.'
-- Tom Hoefling
A Resolution affirming vital existing constitutional protections for the unalienable right to life of every innocent person, from the first moment of creation until natural death.
WHEREAS, The first stated principle of the United States, in its charter, the Declaration of Independence, is the assertion of the self-evident truth that all men are created equal, and that they are each endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, beginning with the right to life, and that the first purpose of all government is to defend that supreme right; and
WHEREAS, The first stated purposes of We the People of the United States in our Constitution are “to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”; and
WHEREAS, The United States Constitution, in the Fourteenth Amendment, imperatively requires that all persons within the jurisdictions of all the States be afforded the equal protection of the laws; and
WHEREAS, The United States Constitution, in the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments, explicitly forbids the taking of the life of any innocent person; and
WHEREAS, The practices of abortion and euthanasia violate every clause of the stated purposes of the United States Constitution, and its explicit provisions; and
WHEREAS, Modern science has demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that the individual human person’s physical existence begins at the moment of biological inception or creation; and
WHEREAS, All executive, legislative and judicial Officers in America, at every level and in every branch, have sworn before God to support the United States Constitution as required by Article VI of that document, and have therefore, because the Constitution explicitly requires it, sworn to protect the life of every innocent person;
THEREFORE, WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES HEREBY RESOLVE that the God-given, unalienable right to life of every innocent person, from biological inception or creation to natural death, be protected everywhere within every state, territory and jurisdiction of the United States of America; that every officer of the judicial, legislative and executive departments, at every level and in every branch, is required to use all lawful means to protect every innocent life within their jurisdictions; and that we will henceforth deem failure to carry out this supreme sworn duty to be cause for removal from public office via impeachment or recall, or by statutory or electoral means, notwithstanding any law passed by any legislative body within the United States, or the decision of any court, or the decree of any executive officer, at any level of governance, to the contrary.
Thanks. Are you on the Nebraska ballot?
Not yet, but it shouldn’t be too much of a problem.
We only need 2500 signatures, and the deadline isn’t until Sept.
Drop us a note if you would like to help collect signatures, or even perhaps be an elector.
Thanks.
If it talks like a republican, but votes and signs legislation like a DEMONRAT it is a DEMONRAT with an R after it's name.
“Fear God and keep His commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgement including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil.”
Now is the time to deal with these issues...not when you stand before Him on judgement day.
Dearest Tau Foods: You don’t read so well, twas tomwhathisname attempting to hide his relationship to said inane and irrelevant parties that made me say he’s a phony.
Like I said earlier, you're just so cute when you get so angry.
Yep,reading and writing are not what I do best. I do try, though.
As I told you previously, I've been involved in exactly two parties in my lifetime, the Republican Party, until four years ago, and the one I am the chairman of now, America's Party.
You made a false claim, I refuted it, and you've been compounding your error ever since.
What is wrong with you?
This is straight from the Party Platform on your website.
We seek the passage of a Federal Marriage Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and oppose all attempts everywhere to redefine marriage as being anything but what it has always been: the union of one man and one woman. Since the natural family is the basic God-given institution of our civilization, and the nursery of our future, it must be protected from all who would destroy it.
Apropos of protecting marriage from those who would destroy it, are you in favor of the current low threshold for divorce in most states? What do you think are acceptable grounds for divorce??
No, I’m not in favor of easy divorce.
This is one area in which I believe the best way forward is to go back to where we were many decades ago.
So why are you pulling the Clintonian lie on FR? Why are you denying what is clearly true? Why would you expect anyone on FR to vote for such a prevaricator?
Hint: Because they're suckers.......
The facts are the facts no matter how many times you try to twist them.
You’re the one who is obsessed with Alan Keyes, apparently.
In the post that started this nonsensical exchange you claimed that I had been involved with multiple parties for the last twenty years, which is simply false.
As I’ve told you repeatedly I was involved only with the Republican Party up until four years ago.
When, if at all, do you think a man should be able to divorce his wife?
When, if at all, do you think a woman should be able to divorce her husband?
Hint: The correct answer is simple.
Excellent rant, Black Elk — along with the ones of yours tha follow on this thread. WELL DONE. And I am a Presbyterian!
You pulled a Clinton, just like I said.
Why would anyone support or vote for you from FR?
Another hint: Because they're suckers.
Arrogance is presuming to dictate to individuals, employers, and the medical industry how to interact IN DETAIL. Arrogance is stating on the record that a minor girl who wants an abortion should be able to override the objections of her parents by going to a judge. Arrogance is dictating to adoption agencies that they must reliquish children in their care to gay couples in the name of gay "rights."
Pride and arrogance are on display in a politician whose lineage boasts ZERO participation in American armed forces, ZERO military veterans, and both pride and arrogance are on extreme display when that same politician -- Mitt Romney -- says his sons are instead "serving their country" by actively campaigning for him in his run for the presidency.
Many conservative, patriotic ABOers, on the other hand, exhibit ZERO arrogance and ZERO pride, but instead exhibit blind fear of Obama. EV, like me, respects that, though I -- and no doubt EV -- think their fear has clouded their judgment.
You know, if I could become just a little more sensitive, I might suspect that you are trying to call folks like me “suckers” in very small print.
Well, I think we deserve a larger font, that’s what I think!
Let's review:
On the other thread, you said:
"Pardon me for reminding you, but you have been the head of another party championing Alan Keyes for almost twenty years now."
To which I responded:
"You're making that up."
Which you did.
As has been explained to you multiple times now, during the first four-fifths of the time period you reference I was a Republican.
Can you produce some evidence for my involvement in any other party prior to 2008?
If not, you should preserve whatever small scraps of your reputation around here might remain at this point and simply admit you were wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.