http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=8379#8379
First one, with the eligibility statement.
Second one, withOUT the elegability statement.
.
I KNEW THIS 4 YEARS AGO
The Hawaiian criminal enterprise will do whatever the larger criminal enterprise (read DNC inc) tells them to do. I’m just surprised they have yet to issue the fraudulent copy they were probably handed when little barry bastard commie’s attorneys flew over to HI just before the usurper ‘released’ his now famous fabricated composite! If Hawaii wants to be criminal to the core, what is going to happen to them for authorizing little barry bastard’s criminal fraud? Nothing, and they arrogantly flaunt this fact every time someone seeks the truth from their lying criminal org.
When this explodes, many Democrat officials in Hawaii, Illinois, and Washington, D. C. should be convicted of treason and jailed for the rest of their lives. This is a direct attack on our nation and its Constitution....that old document that every one of them swore to “uphold and defend.”
When the Democratic Party of Hawaii issued their Official Certification of Nomination for Kerry/Edwards, they included language stating that the two men were constitutionally eligible. The 2008 certification for 0bama/Biden contained no such language.
There’s really only one way for the commie bastards to put this to rest for good. In the not too distant future there will be a break in reported at the records department in Hawaii. Missing will be Barry’s hard copies and the film. The evil bastards will announce this tragedy with weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth and blame it on a right wing, birther, nut job (probably a white Hispanic). They’ll claim that since the documents simply corroborate what they’ve been telling us all along that they are useless to the right wing nut job bent on exposing a fraud that doesn’t exist so the stolen documents will probably just be destroyed; gone forever. Fake documents, supporting a fake man, lost in a fake burglary. End of story.
Really? This was known 4 years ago before the election. It was even posted here on FR if I remember correctly. Just more evidence as to the lack of vetting by the media for the current occupier in the Oval Office
My sometimes rather “earthy” farmer Dad had a figure of speech to indicate his opinion that something would never go very far or make much of a difference: “It won’t amount to a pinch of shit!”
I have seen these little penny-ante expose’ deals come and go, and STILL nobody in the entire Country has had the stones to DO anything about it. Therefore, I’m going to emulate ol’ Dad and opine that neither will THIS revelation via Canada amount to even A PINCH, either!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=8379#8379
First one, with the eligibility statement.
Second one, withOUT the elegability statement.
.
JB Williams, bless his heart is barking up the wrong tree here. HI is the only state to my knowledge that requires both the state and national parties provide a sworn statement that the presidential and vice presidential are constitutionally qualified. The language included in the three DNC certificates provided to HI varies. It was added after the fact to Gore’s certification, left out Kerry’s certification altogether and included in Obama’s. All three DNC certificates issued to the other states were identical meaning verbatim and did not include the constitutionally qualified language. The DNC did not depart from its standard operating practice in regard to the language contained within the certification for Gore, Kerry or Obama it provided to the other 49 states.
What is hinky is the Democratic Party of HI modified its statement to EXCLUDE the constitutionally qualified language from the Obama certification Obama it provided to HI election officials. It is clear this was an intentional omission as the language for the DPH certificates for Gore and Kerry included the constitutionally qualified statement and it was verbatim in every regard.
While I do not disagree something is obviously afoul and the DNC most likely knew there was an eligibility problem, the DNC certificates of themselves are not evidence. The DPH certificates however are evidence that both the DPH and HI election officials knew SOMETHING. The HI Elections Division should have never accepted the 2004 Kerry DNC certificate or the 2008 Obama DPH certificate as it did not meet the requirements contained within HI Statute 11-113.
See:
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol01_Ch0001-0042F/HRS0011/HRS_0011-0113.htm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32614617/Hawaii-2000-and-2004-Certs-Rep-and-Dem
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32614591/2008-HI-Certificate-of-Nomination-Obama
http://www.scribd.com/doc/95568414/Gore-2000-DNC-49-State-Certification (I also have one for Kerry but I cannot locate it at the moment.)
Placemark.