Posted on 05/24/2012 8:11:02 PM PDT by JohnKinAK
Radioactive fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster continues to show up at dangerously high levels in the city of Tokyo, which is located roughly 200 miles from the actual disaster site. According to an analysis of five random soil samples recently taken by nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen, the soil around Tokyo is so contaminated with Fukushima radiation that it would be considered nuclear waste here in the U.S.
During a recent trip to Tokyo, Gundersen collected soil samples from a sidewalk, a children's playground, a rooftop, a patch of moss by the side of a road, and the lawn of a judicial building. After sending those samples in for testing, it was revealed that each one had high levels of radioactive cesium-134 (CS134) and cesium-137 (CS137), while three of the samples contained high levels of cobalt-60 (CO60). One of the samples also tested positive for uranium-235 (U235).
"[W]hen I was in Tokyo, I took some samples [...] and sent them to the lab," said Gundersen in a recent video report. "And the lab determined that all of them would be qualified as radioactive waste here in the United States and would have to be shipped to Texas to be disposed of."
You can view the complete report here: http://www.fairewinds.com
Despite the fact that radioactive plumes from Fukushima have largely drifted seaward based on wind patterns, a considerable amount of this radiation traveled southward towards Tokyo and elsewhere. The findings also confirm the reality that Fukushima radiation has likely had significant global spread as well, which confirms earlier reports of samples taken on the U.S. West Coast
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalnews.com ...
High readings compared to what? You can find radiation almost any where you look...just because you can detect something, does not make it a high radiation level.
And again, anything that would be blown up to the jet stream and across the ocean, thousands of miles, would be so dispersed as to represent virtually no risk of significant exposure downstream.
So one must assume that you expected to see low levels of Fukushima products in US beef ?
I have an idea - why don’t we give California to the Japanese - on the condition they clear out the illegals and assume California’s debt.
It’s a win-win.
The Japanese would make wonderful neighbors and friends - AND California won’t pull down the rest of the country into a deep depression...
The half-life of cobalt-60 is 5.3 years - not 300... Annoying, but livable...
Another article from Natural News (Real News from Real People, Naturally). I don’t know about the fate of the doomed Japanese, but I now know seven foods that will cleanse my liver and a weird Chinese herb that will keep my hair from falling out and a bunch of other great things.
Yes, my cousin’s wife went home, because their apartment was damaged and no base housing was availible.
Japan is so radioactive, their economy is so bad, and anyway their population should be immune to radiation poisoning, thanks to the two WWII nukes, that they should dedicate the islands to the storage of nuclear waste.
The could become what Nevada does not want to.
That's what I was wondering. In California background radiation is considered an unacceptable risk. The Earth is in violation of statute law.
Nice! I’m in Louisiana. Ping me if I ever need to be concerned about Fukushima fallout? K, thx! ;)
We do not want to send the Japanese more radioactive debris. They will have their hands full for decades. And, they are burning some radioactive debris.
If Grand Central Station was a nuclear power one, it would be shut down.
After reading this report, I thought for a moment there that I was dead. I guess I'm not after all. Not even glowing.
Really. The CRAP allowed on the internet these days, and even here at FR. It's sad.
Believe me, the Japanese popular press would be full of lurid accounts of any such widespread radiation. You should have seen the press pandemonium when there was actually a bit found in Tokyo last year. Think the "Daily Mail" on steroids.
Here's the latest WHO exposure summary chart (which, by the way, the Japanese government doesn't agree with, saying that the chart overstates the spread of radiation):
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.