Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tokyo soil so contaminated with radiation it would be considered nuclear waste in US
Natural News ^ | 5/24/2012 | Ethan A. Huff

Posted on 05/24/2012 8:11:02 PM PDT by JohnKinAK

Radioactive fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster continues to show up at dangerously high levels in the city of Tokyo, which is located roughly 200 miles from the actual disaster site. According to an analysis of five random soil samples recently taken by nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen, the soil around Tokyo is so contaminated with Fukushima radiation that it would be considered nuclear waste here in the U.S.

During a recent trip to Tokyo, Gundersen collected soil samples from a sidewalk, a children's playground, a rooftop, a patch of moss by the side of a road, and the lawn of a judicial building. After sending those samples in for testing, it was revealed that each one had high levels of radioactive cesium-134 (CS134) and cesium-137 (CS137), while three of the samples contained high levels of cobalt-60 (CO60). One of the samples also tested positive for uranium-235 (U235).

"[W]hen I was in Tokyo, I took some samples [...] and sent them to the lab," said Gundersen in a recent video report. "And the lab determined that all of them would be qualified as radioactive waste here in the United States and would have to be shipped to Texas to be disposed of."

You can view the complete report here: http://www.fairewinds.com

Despite the fact that radioactive plumes from Fukushima have largely drifted seaward based on wind patterns, a considerable amount of this radiation traveled southward towards Tokyo and elsewhere. The findings also confirm the reality that Fukushima radiation has likely had significant global spread as well, which confirms earlier reports of samples taken on the U.S. West Coast

(Excerpt) Read more at naturalnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: nuclearpower; radiation; skyisfalling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: toldyou
Anyone who expects truth out of government, deserves what they get. The EPA is not even monitoring what is going on within the US. Their radiation network, at the time of the accident, had so many problems it was more or less irrelevant. They could not even determine what normal levels were before the accident, since a few of the sensors were down and some were being operated by volunteer workers.
21 posted on 05/24/2012 9:19:29 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

High readings compared to what? You can find radiation almost any where you look...just because you can detect something, does not make it a high radiation level.

And again, anything that would be blown up to the jet stream and across the ocean, thousands of miles, would be so dispersed as to represent virtually no risk of significant exposure downstream.


22 posted on 05/24/2012 9:20:21 PM PDT by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
That was not the main thrust of that report. They have identified Fukushima radiation products in US beef, and that is okay with you ?

So one must assume that you expected to see low levels of Fukushima products in US beef ?

23 posted on 05/24/2012 9:29:51 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK; TigerLikesRooster

I have an idea - why don’t we give California to the Japanese - on the condition they clear out the illegals and assume California’s debt.

It’s a win-win.

The Japanese would make wonderful neighbors and friends - AND California won’t pull down the rest of the country into a deep depression...


24 posted on 05/24/2012 9:30:38 PM PDT by GOPJ ( "A Dog In Every Pot" - freeper ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
It is from a radiation network that has been monitoring for many months. They know what false readings are. They have had them in the past. This one looks legit, which is why the POTR blog released the alert.
25 posted on 05/24/2012 9:32:24 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

The half-life of cobalt-60 is 5.3 years - not 300... Annoying, but livable...


26 posted on 05/24/2012 9:35:00 PM PDT by GOPJ ( "A Dog In Every Pot" - freeper ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Another article from Natural News (Real News from Real People, Naturally). I don’t know about the fate of the doomed Japanese, but I now know seven foods that will cleanse my liver and a weird Chinese herb that will keep my hair from falling out and a bunch of other great things.


27 posted on 05/24/2012 9:35:12 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

Yes, my cousin’s wife went home, because their apartment was damaged and no base housing was availible.


28 posted on 05/24/2012 10:02:36 PM PDT by razorback-bert (I'm in shape. Round is a shape isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Japan is so radioactive, their economy is so bad, and anyway their population should be immune to radiation poisoning, thanks to the two WWII nukes, that they should dedicate the islands to the storage of nuclear waste.

The could become what Nevada does not want to.


29 posted on 05/24/2012 10:19:00 PM PDT by tdscpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK
According to an analysis of five random soil samples recently taken by nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen, the soil around Tokyo is so contaminated with Fukushima radiation that it would be considered nuclear waste here in the U.S.

Gee, you'd think people in Japan would be fleeing Tokyo in droves. Arnie Gundersen is a fairly well known nuclear alarmist and sensationalist, which makes him a "nuclear expert" as far as network news is concerned but lends no credibility to anything he says.
30 posted on 05/24/2012 10:30:31 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: AndyTheBear
Or does it mean that what nuclear waste standards in U.S are silly?

That's what I was wondering. In California background radiation is considered an unacceptable risk. The Earth is in violation of statute law.

33 posted on 05/24/2012 11:47:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nvscanman

Nice! I’m in Louisiana. Ping me if I ever need to be concerned about Fukushima fallout? K, thx! ;)


34 posted on 05/24/2012 11:54:08 PM PDT by Casie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tdscpa

We do not want to send the Japanese more radioactive debris. They will have their hands full for decades. And, they are burning some radioactive debris.


35 posted on 05/24/2012 11:54:48 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: AndyTheBear

If Grand Central Station was a nuclear power one, it would be shut down.


37 posted on 05/25/2012 1:57:33 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Procyon
Thank goodness.

After reading this report, I thought for a moment there that I was dead. I guess I'm not after all. Not even glowing.

Really. The CRAP allowed on the internet these days, and even here at FR. It's sad.

38 posted on 05/25/2012 2:19:42 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (A great victory for Free People. The day Salvador Allende was toppled. Study history. Learn lessons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Yeah.
Like the reactors that could not possibly explode.
Or the reactors that could not possibly melt down.
Or the reactors that could not loose containment from the RPV.
Or the reactors that had achieved cold shutdown.
Now that was all bull crap with plenty more to follow no doubt. Latest news is from the WHO, nothing to worry about. Of course they fail to mention that Japan personally lobbied the WHO to demand it change its report simply because it might make Japan look bad.
39 posted on 05/25/2012 2:57:14 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK
This is a stupid hoax.

Believe me, the Japanese popular press would be full of lurid accounts of any such widespread radiation. You should have seen the press pandemonium when there was actually a bit found in Tokyo last year. Think the "Daily Mail" on steroids.

Here's the latest WHO exposure summary chart (which, by the way, the Japanese government doesn't agree with, saying that the chart overstates the spread of radiation):

Image courtesy of Asahi.com

40 posted on 05/25/2012 3:23:20 AM PDT by snowsislander (Please, America, no more dog-eating Kenyan cokeheads in the Oval Office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson