God bless and protect all those who serve. And all those who love them. I’ve got 3 nephews in the USMC right now. You and I probably have a lot more in common than separates us - something I always seem to be too quick to forget.
A theory I have regarding that has support from what Bettina Viviano has said, as well as what a guy who wrote white papers about economic terrorism has written in his book - and some of the evidence from his book. I’ve got tons of info that led me to think this is what happened as well, but don’t have time right now to go into it all.
A very thin summary:
George Soros, who has always been a communist and has gotten rich by manipulating currencies, has said that the 2 enemies that he (as God, he actually believes) needs to fight are the USA and capitalism. He has said that he is afraid the US would win the war on terror, because then those 2 great evils - America and capitalism - would then be strong. Soros has also said that he owns the democratic party; he has bought and paid for them; they are his.
The Cloward-Piven Plan was developed by Columbia University professors Richard Cloward and Francis Fox-Piven. Piven recommended the start of The New Party, to try to merge communism with the democratic party there in Chicago. Obama was a signed member of The New Party. Some of the platforms of the Cloward-Piven Plan to destroy the US included the subversion of the electoral system through the Motor Voter Act, ACORN, etc and the destruction of our economy by flooding it with welfare/illegals/takers and overtaxing the producers, as well as by forcing banks to do subprime lending. Barack Obama, in his only acts as a lawyer, argued Motor Voter and harassed banks to get them to do subprime lending (via the Community Reinvestment Act) - which ultimately led to the banks’ plunge to imminent bankruptcy.
Dang, this is going to be too long. I need to cut to the chase. Bettina Viviano says top dems told her that Soros asked both Hillary and Obama if they would go along with his plan to destroy the US economy. Hillary wouldn’t; Obama would. What Soros needed was control of enough money that he could do on a global scale the same kind of economic terrorism that he had done his whole life on individual countries -economic terrorism methods that are also embraced by Islam, and the guy who wrote the book I referenced says that our intelligence people were asked (in 2007, IIRC) if they were aware of a Muslim economic attack that was going to be coming.
What Soros did was to unite the enemies of the USA: communism and Islamism. Together, they controlled enough money to make the Sept 2008 run on the bank. Having displayed their power, they then had the ammunition to use as a threat to get anybody they wanted to comply with their wishes.
Basically they took the US and all its systems hostage, saying to all the critical people: “We did the run on the bank in Sept 2008 and we can do it again at any time of our choosing, and destroy the whole world’s economy. Play by our rules and we’ll let the world go on as before. Mess with us, and Armageddon is on your shoulders.”
We know that Soros threatened NBC, CBS, and FOX, as well as 2 prominent radio companies, in October and December of 2008, saying to the heads of those companies that if they allowed anybody to report on Obama’s eligibility (and later that was extended to include his radical connections as well), something very bad would happen. The media heads said to their on-air personalities that the threat was FCC and FTC annihilation after the election if they didn’t do as they were told - and the media companies said careers and possibly lives would be destroyed if anybody misbehaved. But the threat of FCC/FTC annihilation after the election was a vain threat by itself, because by reporting the threats to Bush’s DOJ, the media companies could have kept Obama out of the White House and eliminated the threat. It had to be something much bigger.
I believe it was the threat of another run on the bank. And I believe we can pinpoint the exact days when President Bush and John McCain were threatened (McCain suspended his campaign and tried to cancel the debates, and Bush gave a speech saying it would be the end of the world if we didn’t pass TARP - all on the same day), when Judge Surick (in the Berg case) was threatened, when Chief Justice John Roberts was threatened (the very same day as SCOTUS refused to hear Donofrio’s case, but before the result was announced, Roberts issued an ex parte invitation to Obama to meet at the Supreme Court; all previous meetings had been instigated by the PRESIDENT-ELECT, not the judge - and never when there was anything pending before SCOTUS that involved the President-elect). John Boehner as minority leader was probably made aware of the threat. The eligibility judges that had ethics breaches - Judge David Carter, Michael Malihi, etc...
Like I said, I’ve got a LOT of reasons why I believe this; it’s too much to go into (I’m already way behind on my newspaper work for the week so I need to get back to work soon). But this scenario would explain a lot of things that otherwise don’t make sense. Why good, patriotic people in positions of power are standing idly by while Obama trashes all the checks and balances, the Constitution, the rule of law, etc...
This guy’s book - Kevin D Freeman (see http://secretweapon.org/about-author/ and see also http://lys-dor.com/tag/unrestricted-warfare/ I don’t have time to find the link to the video by The Heritage Foundation or the article by The American Legion, but they’ve both had stuff about it; the Heritage Foundation video was the subject of a thread here at FR). Anyway, “Secret Weapon” is about the use of economic terrorism, and he believes that economic terrorism was used in Sept 2008. The scary thing is that he can’t get anybody in the government to do anything to keep this from being able to happen again.
If my theory is correct, somebody like Boehner would always have to block any efforts that would put the US on more stable economic ground - for fear of Soros triggering economic Armageddon. The leaders - even non-RINO leaders - would believe the first thing we have to do is to get Obama out of office and take the House and Senate so protection against economic terrorism could be passed very quickly, thus robbing Soros of his weapon with which he has held the US hostage.
I don’t like this theory. But the more I see, the more I suspect it might be true - because it explains what we’re all seeing but none of us understands.
I wish I had time to explain more of my reasons, but I guess this is already too long as it is. lol.
And now I better get back to work.
BRAVO!
Thank you for taking the time to detail the background that has led to your theories. You have really done your homework. I have heard much of what you write about while listening to Glenn Beck from time to time.
I just have a very hard time believing that so many people, knowing of or being subject to threats, would cower silently in fear. The best way to diffuse a threat is to expose it in all its entirety.
If what you write is true, George Soros would be ruined, never accepted by polite society again, and dogged by angry detractors for the rest of his days. He would also be a criminal. Threatening public officials in order to effect policy is criminal activity.
I guess I ascribe to the axiom that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. So I attribute the crash of 2008 to the unsustainable housing bubble (most economists concur) and I attribute all the anomalies about Obama’s records to his wanting to hide the fact that he used his Kenyan and Indonesian heritage to receive preferential treatment at Harvard and Columbia. I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually falsified his admission documents and claimed that he WAS born in Kenya or that he was a dual citizen - U.S. and Indonesia.
He could have done this on a host of documents, including Social Security application, Selective Service registration, etc. The recent information regarding his bio in his books (that he was born in Kenya) that went uncorrected for years supports my opinion. Also the “composite girlfriend” and other obviously fabricated accounts in his books lead me to think that he created a larger than life bio fantasy because he felt compelled to be much more unique and important than he actually was. No surprise, he’s a narcissist.
Obama must be defeated and he can be defeated on the issues. Then we can condemn him and his America hating cohorts to the ash heap of history.
Thank you both.
Mr Freeman’s articles are here, Global Economic Warfare, a website.
http://globaleconomicwarfare.com/
THE VIDEO PRESENTATION AT HERITAGE can be found in the link you provided.
“I dont have time to find the link to the video by The Heritage Foundation or the article by The American Legion, but theyve both had stuff about it; the Heritage Foundation video was the subject of a thread here at FR)”.