Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/08/2012 12:53:07 PM PDT by Mich1193
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Mich1193
When political candidates are male and they usually are, females have a tendency to vote with their genitals not their minds. Obama 2008, case and point. There, I said it and I am absolutely NOT talking about the women here at FR. You are intelligent but unfortunately not the typical, 20-something bimbos running amok in America.

( ( ( ( ( (( BLACK MAGIC in progress )) ) ) ) ) )

37 posted on 05/08/2012 1:14:53 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193
As my late uncle was fond of saying ... "Women have too much power already...they control half the money .... and *all* the affection!"

(Ok, so I paraphrased a bit!) :)

39 posted on 05/08/2012 1:15:46 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

Taxpayers, veterans and landowners should get a weighted ballot. Perhaps veterans given a ballot worth 2X for one example. Everyone should vote but some voters are more important than others. IMO anyway.


40 posted on 05/08/2012 1:16:05 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193
I might agree with you except for the fact that most of the people running this country into the ground right now are men and most of the people supporting them are men also. Sure there are a few women but the much larger percentage are men. Just sayin’.
43 posted on 05/08/2012 1:18:29 PM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

ANN COULTER reasons it this way:

“If we took away women’s right to vote, we’d never have to worry about another Democrat president. It’s kind of a pipe dream, it’s a personal fantasy of mine, but I don’t think it’s going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.”


46 posted on 05/08/2012 1:24:32 PM PDT by jimsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

I didn’t read the article, but thought I’d repeat what I’ve posted in the past quite often when a thread like this warrants the post.

My wife believes that women shouldn’t have the vote simply because as she states of the absolutely stupid reasons they vote for. Mostly emotional, impulsive.

Records indicate the women’s vote successfully sicced upon our society Carter, Clinton, and Obama to name a few.

I don’t argue with her.


47 posted on 05/08/2012 1:25:21 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

“The problem with mankind is that men are lunatics and women are idiots.” - Rebecca West

“The women got the vote and the nation got Harding.” - anon

Anne Coulter made more or less the same point. Votes for women means big government and income redistribution.


48 posted on 05/08/2012 1:27:59 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Rush: If Ward Churchill had a daughter, she’d look like Elizabeth Warren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; Just A Nobody; theothercheek; EternalVigilance; ...
Before the 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920, several states allowed women to vote. I recall seeing a study on comparative state spending between the period just before women suffrage came in and the period immediately following. The conclusion was unmistakable: women suffrage correlated strongly with increased state spending and more bloated state governments.

When women began voting nationally, the large majority of woman voters were married and voted pretty much as their husbands did. But in the last thirty to forty years or so, with more unmarried women and more women reliant on Big Brother, there has been a noticeable "gender gap" in the presidential vote, with women significantly more likely to vote Democrat.

If I'm not mistaken, no Democrat in a presidential race has won the men's vote since Lyndon Johnson! So it's reasonable to think that the country would have been spared quite a number of left-leaning policies had it not been for the Nineteenth Amendment.

50 posted on 05/08/2012 1:35:02 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

Oh, goody. Another “Wimmin R Evil” thread on FR. I’m shocked.


52 posted on 05/08/2012 1:38:15 PM PDT by Politicalmom (THIS IS NOT A GOP CHEERLEADING SITE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

You’ve got to admit that without the women’s vote we probably wouldn’t be falling into a marxist cesspool.


53 posted on 05/08/2012 1:46:26 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193
AFACTOIDAP
(Alert Females And Convince Them Obama Is Destroying America Permanently)
77 posted on 05/08/2012 3:38:27 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193
How Dramatically Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government? by John R. Lott Jr.

Using data from 1870 to 1940, Lott and Larry Kenny studied how state government expenditures and revenue changed in 48 state governments after women obtained the right to vote. Women were able to vote in 29 states before women's suffrage and the adoption of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution. Lott found that the impact of granting of women's suffrage on per-capita state government expenditures and revenue was startling.[29]

His research indicates that women's suffrage had a bigger impact on government spending and taxes in states with a greater percentage of women. Even after accounting for variables such as industrialization, urbanization, education and income, per capita real state government spending, which had been flat or falling during the 10 years before women began voting, doubled during the next 11 years. The increase in government spending and revenue started immediately after women started voting in national elections and 19 additional state elections.

78 posted on 05/08/2012 3:59:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Do I really need a sarcasm tag? Seriously? You're that dense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

God made Eve as helpmate to Adam, not as property.

This guy is a class A MORON.


103 posted on 05/08/2012 8:06:16 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

My mother always said giving women the vote was the stupidest thing they ever did!


113 posted on 05/09/2012 12:58:23 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mich1193

If there is a single nation where women can’t vote, that is NOT a third world hellhole, I would like to know which country it is. You look at the nations with the highest standards of living, and they don’t share Peterson’s view of women. (I guess he never heard of the Queen of the South).


128 posted on 05/11/2012 8:00:12 AM PDT by TheDingoAteMyBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson