Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Please feel free to answer any/all issues I raise.
1 posted on 05/05/2012 9:52:35 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Secret Agent Man

FWIW, DHS didn’t get the ammo they requested. Congress wouldn’t give them the money, they said that the expenditure was unjustified and unnecessary.


38 posted on 05/06/2012 3:15:20 AM PDT by Rearden (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
One thing is certain, we do not have long to wait. Maybe three months before the fog leaves the crystal ball, six months at the outset. I hope those that outwardly dismiss your questions at least have a contingency plan in place. This month I am closely watching developments in Chicago. Who do you suppose scheduled a NATO world summit for Chicago in May of an election year?
39 posted on 05/06/2012 3:26:28 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
I don't put anything past this guy. I've just been thinking this narcissistic, marxist little bitch isn't leaving even if he loses.

A few EMPs and it is game over (imho). It would take years to bring all the lights back. Six months in and the times of no lights (imho) would be lights out for civilization probably worldwide. Would achieve zer0's goals and others' claiming to represent 'We, the People' goals. Realize this does not address your writing, though believe it to be an actual possibility based upon the last two lines of your writing (copied above).

40 posted on 05/06/2012 3:36:21 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

There will be elections, and if he loses he will leave Jan 20.
The Obama may be all kinds of bad, but he does not have what it takes to take over as tyrant.

Fun to imagine he’ll try though.


41 posted on 05/06/2012 3:44:09 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

According to a large number of vanitites posted on this board Obama is to be preferred over the likely GOP nominee. To this end they are tirelessly giving Obama and his supporters issues to exploit against the GOP nominee. There comes a time when those whose candidate has lost to acknowledge the democratice choice. Acceptance does not equate to enthusiastic support.


42 posted on 05/06/2012 3:47:31 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

Tin foil hat time


45 posted on 05/06/2012 4:39:13 AM PDT by WriteOn (Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

When Bill Clinton ran for reelection in 1996 there was all sorts of chatter that he would, through executive order, cancel the election. Same thing the left said in 2004. Never happened. Won’t happen in 2012.


47 posted on 05/06/2012 5:03:40 AM PDT by EagleInGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
The Feds play no part in the election. The individual states are responsible for holding the election. Obama would be starting a civil war if he attempted to bar the states from holding an election. He may disrupt some polling stations with his Black Panthers & the like, but he cannot stop 50+ elections.

Obama intends to steal the election through fraudulent voters, hacking the results, & contesting the vote in court. He only has to be successful at this in a few key precincts to win. That the Pubs are running such a weak candidate as Romney makes the cheating more likely to succeed.

If Obama loses despite his massive cheating, he will wreak havoc on this country in his remaining days; pardoning numerous crooks & killers (Corzine & Jamal are at the top of the list), & blatantly using executive orders to further destroy America. I fully expect the display of “sour grapes” to go down in history as the most disgraceful act of any former President. If you think the Clinton trashing of the White House was deplorable, wait until we see what the exiting Obama administration does.

49 posted on 05/06/2012 5:15:15 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

1. We’re screwed.

2. We’re screwed.

3. We’re screwed.

4. We’re screwed.

5. We’re screwed.

6. We’re screwed.

7. We’re screwed.

Q.E.D.


50 posted on 05/06/2012 6:12:06 AM PDT by Lazamataz (To the wall, street occupiers!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

My answers: (responses of which dictated by my previous answers, not that other points are irrelevant per se, but irrelevant as far as my answers are concerned)

1. Not at all. Even his most strident Demwit supporter would be offended at such an obviously transparent action. He’d be run out on a rail if he tried that.

2. Significant concern (with a caveat). I’d submit, any state that is contesting voter ID laws, and where such contests actually have a shot of succeeding, is already lost to the Dem machine, truly. IOW, already known as a blue state, so not really a net gain for Obama.

4. Slightly concerned. He may try to repeat the contest of 2000; I can already see the headlines now, “If Bush can do it, why can’t Obama?”

5. Only VERY “slightly concerned”. I only say that because there’s no way to predict the weather/natural disasters. And it would have to be a natural disaster to even consider such an obviously transparent action; a natural disaster of significant proportion that such a “crisis” would reasonably extend past the time the new President would be sworn in. See the movie “Deep Impact”, “2012”, or the supposed “Myan prophecies” for what I’m talking about here. Also, it would have to be a natural disaster, not some man made disaster; see point 1.

6. If point 1 occurs, there will be an almost immediate uprising, with no real “civil war”. Again, he’ll just simply be thrown out almost immediately. If point 5 occurs, to the degree I specified, there won’t be enough of humanity left to engage in Civil War II, so kind of a moot point.

(other questions, again, ignored for their irrelevancy given my answers)


64 posted on 05/06/2012 8:21:58 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
Yes, we will have an election. If Obama wins it, it will be because we ran a lousy candidate and conservatives stayed home. If conservatives hold their nose and push Romney to victory, Obama will leave the White House at noon next January 20th where he will enjoy a lucrative post-presidential career on the lecture circuit and playing golf.
71 posted on 05/06/2012 8:43:00 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

http://www.beaconequity.com/we-are-preparing-for-massive-civil-war-says-dhs-informant-2012-05-03/

“We are Preparing for Massive Civil War,” Says DHS Informant


76 posted on 05/06/2012 9:43:32 AM PDT by txgirl4Bush (2012 can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

Similar things were said about Clinton and Bush, and I heard them personally. People assume the worst, and so far, it hasn’t happened. There would be Democrats who would fight this from Obama.


89 posted on 05/07/2012 6:24:59 AM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson