You don’t know that Martin attacked Zimmerman, no one knows. What I do know is that the two lead investigators did not believe Zimmerman’s story and wanted an arrest warrent. This is when the stand your ground law became an issue. I know there is a dead seventeen year old and to call him a “thug” and a “savage” is heart wrenching to me. I would not want my life and character to be defined and judged at age seventeen. Trayvon was young and stupid, a lot of kids are at that age. But he didn’t deserve to die.
Wake up dude, use your brain.
Zimmerman had injuries on his backside, Trayvon didn’t. Duh, who attacked who??
By the way, in case you didn’t know, there’s no “right” to jump, assault, or attack someone, just because you think they’re shadowing you.
Did you follow the Duke Lacrosse case? I think it is harder to follow this case if you are not familiar when the media's and the Left’s (the race pimps) pattern of racial and emotional manipulation here.
If a seventeen year old boy jumped you and started smashing your head, broke your nose and was wailing away on your body, you would not be thinking of him as an innocent anything. “Kids” this age and younger have been jumping whites in packs and beating them since last summer in Chicago, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Denver, Cincinnati, etc.
If it happened to me, I would not hesitate to shoot. If you want to get shot or go to prison, act the racist thug. If you choose to give up your life and health for the sake of a thug, that is your choice. A thug is a bad azz who thinks it s a good idea to jump someone they perceive weaker than themselves or their mob.
17 is plenty old enough to be viewed and judged as an adult. Here in Texas we will give you the needle at 17. Only liberals whine about extending childhood into the 20 's PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY that is what true conservatives live by. By 17 I was serving my country honorably in the armed forces and had 2 semesters of college down as well. I graduated high school at 16 two years early. I most certainly stand by the MAN I was at 17. This No_limit_nigga got what he deserved when he attacked a man smaller in size than him who also had a gun. Who cares if the dispatcher told him no need to follow dispatchers are not law agents and have NO LEGAL AUTHORITY even then he said OK and turned back to his vehicle. He deserved to die for putting the life of another man at risk by beating him to the ground. What is also of importance is that the shell casing was not ejected from the gun, the only way this happens is if the slide is prevented from cycling to full rear. The most common cause of this is someone has there hand over the top of the gun, given that the thug was shot from the front with an upward bullet path this all points to GZ on his back with TM over him with TM hand on the gun. That from this professionals point of view is a good shoot then. I say professional because I was an MP for 2yrs MPI for 2 more and CID for 4 years I know a thing or two about crime scene investigation and ballistics. It is oviouse you are letting emotion rule your thought process but the facts will come out and from the facts released so far it looks like GZ got a good shoot and TM was just a thug who assaulted the wrong armed citizen. If that is true as the facts will eventually prove one way or the other then yeah he did deserve to die for assaulting a smaller man with a fireman