________________________________
Your statement presumes that TM assaulted GZ. Exactly how do you know this?
How do you know that GZ didn't approach TM with the gun showing and that TM wasn't fighting to keep him from pulling or using it?
Either scenario could be true and both are plausible.....so....please tell us exactly how you know what happened.
And please don't say, "because the killer said so."
If you are unarmed and someone approaches you, with apparent ill intent and a weapon exposed or drawn, you're going to attack him to disarm him? You're straining credulity here.
There's a lot more physical evidence and witness testimony to support the "Sweet Widdle Twayvon attacked big meanie George Zimmerman" than the converse.
The fact that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin doesn't automatically make everything he says wrong.
You're showing every sign of being one of Rev. Al's "Useful Idiots".
TM was in the dark in the rain walking between houses. The phone call to the police confirms this- Zimmerman lost sight of him when he went between buildings.
He could have walked ON the sidewalk 850 feet to his home in the time it took for all this to happen
Zimmerman was there doing what he was supposed to be doing
Trayvon was not - he could have walked straight to the store and back, but he didn't. He made himself suspicious to the COMMUNITY WATCH that Had been set up BECAUSE of all the burglaries
He had a history of being found with burglary tools and women's jewelry that he said he “didnt know” who they belonged to.
ALL the evidence points to trayvon casing the place and zimmerman being attacked.
Yes, I cn see your point that it COULD HAVE happened differently, with zimmerman at fault- but the evidence so far points the other way, and you cannot convict zimmermn on the chance tht MAYBE it happened differently.