That seems reasonable.
So they’ve got a paper document for Virginia’s birth, and the information has been entered into their database. Just like anybody else.
They just refuse to let her brother see it.
Why?
I don't know. It doesn't make any sense. Perhaps they didn't think anyone would ever want a birth certificate for a child which died so soon, and either lost it or threw it out.
Anyway, He apparently lost in court, despite what the law says about showing it to a person with a vested interest. This just goes to show that the courts can ignore the law whenever they want to; A fact which makes it all the more plausible that a court will also do so if they want a birth certificate created.
They didn’t throw it out, because they still had it when the records were added to the electronic database. That means it had been microfilmed on multiple security copies and the paper original was stored in a bound volume.
They have the document, they just refuse to allow Virginia’s brother to see it.
Courts can’t LAWFULLY ignore the laws whenever they want to. They can when they themselves are lawless thugs who have no fear of law enforcement or political consequences, and that’s clearly what we’ve got in Hawaii. It’s also what we’ve got in Georgia and New Jersey... And Washington DC...
It’s that pattern of total lawlessness by government entities that makes this so menacing. When the government is lawless, the people have no protection from ANYTHING.