Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
But any document that they created would be a PAPER document, and the posse has shown that the scan Obama produced was never taken from a paper document.

You've said that before, and I don't understand why you think it's significant. In order to create a new paper document, you must first create a digital file. (nowadays, not yesteryear.)

Thus what Obama produced CANNOT be from the HDOH, period.

That does not follow. Your reason above does not support your subsequent conclusion. DOH MUST create a digital file (nowadays) before they can create a paper document. (In the case of Adopted Children.)

That digital image was not a scan of any birth certificate at all - not an original, not a supplemental.

I know. It was a digital image file. So?

The adoption theory may well be what happened, but it does not explain why Obama presented a criminal forgery.

If it is the product of DOH Hawaii, it is not criminal, and it is not considered by law to be a forgery.

From my perspective, it is a virtual certainty that Obama was adopted not once, but twice. (1965 by Lolo Soetoro and again in 1971 by his grandparents.)

It is likewise axiomatic (from my perspective) that if he was adopted, he MUST have a replacement birth certificate.

If the initial premise is true, (he was adopted) then the subsequent conclusions must also be true. (He has an official fake replacement birth certificate.)

35 posted on 04/11/2012 8:25:47 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

If he was adopted in 1965 and/or 1971 he had a paper supplemental BC made then. Why, then, would the HDOH create a C&P’ed digital file in 2011 rather than copyihg the original that’s in their files and certifying it, like they said they had done in the cover letter?

The only way your theory works to explain the PDF Obama posted is if Obama was adopted by Barack Obama Sr in April of 2011 (an impossible event since Sr is dead) and the HDOH was still working on creating the supplemental BC when they received the April 2011 request from Obama so they sent him a working electronic file instead of a copy of an actual paper document. And even at that Fuddy would have had to lie in her cover letter by claiming she had personally observed Onaka make the copy from the original.

No matter how you slice it, that PDF cannot be a scan of what the HDOH sent Obama. And the HDOH knows it full well.


37 posted on 04/11/2012 11:40:48 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson