Skip to comments.
Obama: NOT a Lawyer... NOT a Professor... (and Surely No Genius, Either!)
Reaganite Republican ^
| April 5, 2012
| Reaganite Republican
Posted on 04/06/2012 4:46:26 AM PDT by Reaganite Republican
Why don't the Obamas -touted as brilliant minds/teachers- have their law licenses? Seems they where forced to cough them up, in Barack's case to avoid charges for false statements i.e. he had 'no prior aliases', among other things.
For those not familiar with the intricacies of the Bar Association, a "Voluntary Surrender" of one's license is not something where you just forget to renew it. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender' your license five seconds before the state suspends you.
Michelle Obama also 'voluntarily surrendered' her law license in 1993. The search engine linked above has blocked all info on 'disciplinary action', so we may never know the truth as to why.
And Barack Obama was nothing like the legal scholar he's purported to have been: former students have recently come out as 'shocked' at their former teacher's ignorance of the US Constitution, but that just goes to show you that a 'senior lecturer' is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is entirely another: and Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the University of Chicago- period. Yes, the University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school. In reality, that is a title Obama -who only taught courses there part-time- never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008. "He did not hold the title of Professor of Law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.According to the the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law, Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn't even considered. But soon afterward, the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. They said he didn't have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor... and barely an adjunct. The other (real) professors 'hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool.'Another Chicago Law professor said that Obama 'had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building'. The same prof expressed serious doubt as to whether BHO was ever legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is a standard prerequisite for the position).
Perhaps this all helps to explain then the way that the former 'Constitutional Senior Lecturer' cited the U.S. Constitution during his most recent State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence .... not the Constitution .
Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal." Uh, btw Mr. President... those promises are not a 'notion'... the Founding Fathers said they are 'unalienable rights- BIG difference. And the document you quoted form was actually The Declaration of Independence:
'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.'
And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court just moments later? Did this fraud ever even graduate from Harvard...?
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: birth; birthcertificate; certificate; fraud; lawyer; obama; professor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Reaganite Republican
Sorry, but the link posted in the comment “reality lost his license to practice law because he lied on the application...” does not in any way substantiate he claim of lying on his application.
21
posted on
04/06/2012 5:29:17 AM PDT
by
MindBender26
(New Army SF and Ranger Slogan: Vengeance is Mine, sayeth the Lord.... but He subcontracts!)
To: Reaganite Republican
Sorry, but the link posted in the comment “reality lost his license to practice law because he lied on the application...” does not in any way substantiate he claim of lying on his application.
22
posted on
04/06/2012 5:29:23 AM PDT
by
MindBender26
(New Army SF and Ranger Slogan: Vengeance is Mine, sayeth the Lord.... but He subcontracts!)
To: Conscience of a Conservative
“I personally have asked hundreds of high priced and well known attorneys as to how often a supposed Harvard or Yale Law School Graduate VOLUNTARILY gives up their license to practice law”
Did your wife graduate from Harvard or Yale Law School?
To: Reaganite Republican
As to Obamas LSAT scores, Jimmy Hoffas body will be unearthed before those are. My favorite question of libs: If Obama is what he says he is, why has he spent all that money sequestering all of his records, from high school through law school? Not one lib can give an answer.
24
posted on
04/06/2012 5:32:55 AM PDT
by
econjack
To: Conscience of a Conservative
The ranks of management in the federal government are littered with inactive lawyers.
We had a fellow working as a contractor for us ages ago who had both a law degree and a masters in some sort of engineering field ~ he preferred engineering.
I'd imagined at the time his father was happy to quit paying his kid's tuition!
25
posted on
04/06/2012 5:35:32 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Reaganite Republican
The established liberal trope is that the Left is composed of the enlightened elite while the Right is a milling herd of unwashed morons. Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. John Kennedy was a leader of Arthurian force. Barack Obama was a star legal mind. Even Jimmy Carter and — laughably — Al Gore were held up as intellectual exemplars. Meanwhile, George Bush was a tongue-tied boob, Gerald Ford was a stumbling clod, and Ronald Reagan was a doddering old fool who could barely feed himself.
Yet by any objective standard, the “successes” these self-declared liberal geniuses have had in correcting the nation’s ills have been mighty rare. And closer examination of their credentials seldom bears out the lavish praise heaped on their abilities. Mostly, they tend to be pretty packages with nothing inside.
26
posted on
04/06/2012 5:44:37 AM PDT
by
IronJack
(=)
To: Reaganite Republican
Obama: NOT a Lawyer... NOT a Professor... (and Surely No Genius, Either!)This phoney marxist and his ilk have been a plague on America for a long time. Tragic!!
27
posted on
04/06/2012 5:46:18 AM PDT
by
GoldenPup
(Comrade "O" has got to GO!!)
To: Reaganite Republican
Good cons don’t need to be geniuses; they only need to appeal to fools and dullards...
28
posted on
04/06/2012 5:50:04 AM PDT
by
LRS
("How many fingers, Winston?")
To: Reaganite Republican
Change his name to Bankrupt H. Obama.
To: GoldenPup
Good read, not shocking....I hope this gets around.
30
posted on
04/06/2012 5:52:35 AM PDT
by
freebird5850
(Of course Obama loves his country...but I love the United States of America.)
To: Reaganite Republican
As for Obumbo being editor of the Harvard Law Review, it is my understanding that EVERY student in the law school is given
the title of “editor” for a short period of time.
It is akin to the old radio show, QUEEN FOR A DAY.
Everything about Obumbo’s life is a lie, and built on the same principle.
31
posted on
04/06/2012 5:56:48 AM PDT
by
AlexW
To: Reaganite Republican
” his word on anything: are you aware that the former editor of the Harvard Law Revue . . . “
He was never an “Editor” of any kind. That would be an intellectually challenging position. He was the “president” of the Law Review - an elected, political, public relations position.
Editors actually help produce something.
Just sayin’
32
posted on
04/06/2012 5:57:41 AM PDT
by
John Galt's cousin
(Principled Conservatism NOW! * * * * * * * * * * Repeal the 17th Amendment!)
To: Reaganite Republican
33
posted on
04/06/2012 5:57:59 AM PDT
by
VTenigma
To: Reaganite Republican
34
posted on
04/06/2012 5:58:16 AM PDT
by
RetSignman
(I take responsibility for what I post not for what you understand.)
To: Conscience of a Conservative
There is a difference between inactive and surrendered....
35
posted on
04/06/2012 5:58:19 AM PDT
by
Nifster
To: Reaganite Republican
the folks on here claiming that they know lawyers who have voluntarily surrendered their license....i note that you are able to provide some reasons....if im not mistaken, moochelle’s reasons are not given, and are not available.
if they are as benign as some of the examples given....why are we not made aware of hers?
To: Conscience of a Conservative
Exactly however it is true Michelle’s hospital job was an obvious patronage position.
38
posted on
04/06/2012 6:02:14 AM PDT
by
Williams
(Honey Badger Don't Care)
To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
Terrific point! Waiting for the response!
To: Reaganite Republican
President Obama has been a life-long beneficiary of affirmative action. That includes his Nobel Peace Prize.
40
posted on
04/06/2012 6:17:04 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Socialism isn't going to work this time, either.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson