Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin: Paul Ryan says to rally around Romney, but why should I? Just because he said so?
the Right Scoop ^ | March 31st, 2012 | Staff

Posted on 04/01/2012 2:03:46 PM PDT by Sun

It’s very painful to watch all these politicians – even some who are conservatives, don’t get me wrong, but they’re politicians nonetheless – that we all have to rally around, rally around…

Let me tell you something. We have to rally around the Constitution. We have to rally around our children and grandchildren. We have to rally around principles, tried and true principles based on human experience. This isn’t about rallying around some politician. It’s about fighting for our country, taking our country back. This is the process.

But to hear some of these numbskulls who think they’re so smart tell us “yeah there’ve been some people out there who’ve really divided us“. Well then I guess we shouldn’t have a primary! I guess we shouldn’t look at anybody’s record! I guess we should just say ‘John McCain you’re it, Bob Dole you’re it, another Bush you’re it, eh Romney you’re it, this one’s it‘, why do we go through the process? In other words that’s just about as stupid as you can to get to make comments like that.

He goes on to suggest that just because Paul Ryan says to rally around Romney, doesn’t make him want to change his mind.

(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: marklevin; no2backstabbers; no2bigdigs; no2dogabusers; no2ineligibles; no2liars; no2panderers; no2phonies; no2posers; no2romney; no2romneycare; no2tarp; no2traitors; paulryan; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
Just want to add, that I listened to the Mark Levin show that night, and he did say he LOVED Paul Ryan, BUT........

Rick Santorum good naturedly said (paraphrasing), on one of the Sunday tv shows today, that Paul Ryan (and Rubio) are young and can make mistakes. :)

Also, it's no secret that Rick Santorum is Mark's favorite candidate.

1 posted on 04/01/2012 2:03:50 PM PDT by Sun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; Lazlo in PA; Clintonfatigued; AmericanInTokyo; American Constitutionalist

FYI


2 posted on 04/01/2012 2:04:35 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun
He goes on to suggest that just because Paul Ryan says to rally around Romney, doesn’t make him want to change his mind.

I agree. Milt will have to personally cut me a check for my support just like he did for these dopes that are endorsing him.

3 posted on 04/01/2012 2:08:55 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun; no dems; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; JulieRNR21; metmom; Jacquerie

I will not vote for Mittens Romney in the primary. As for the general, I can be persuaded to support him, but I’m not committed to it.


4 posted on 04/01/2012 2:09:25 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Not Milt. NEVER.

EVERY advantage is gone with Romney.

The GOP could win on eligibility alone.

... On the economy alone (The DNC will point to what
Romney did to Mass.)

... On RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE alone.


5 posted on 04/01/2012 2:11:00 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

I heard Mark say it too on his national radio program, thank you for sharing this Sun.

I wish I could find the quote, Mark also said something like, People notice, the “insiders” are endorsing Romney.

It’s going to happen, more “enlightenment” soon.


6 posted on 04/01/2012 2:11:23 PM PDT by stpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I find it interesting that some FReepers who screeched long and loud about Santorum’s endorsement of Arlen Specter years ago are now rationalizing supporting Romney for political reasons.


7 posted on 04/01/2012 2:11:32 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sun

I have seen no reason for any conservative to want to rally around Romney.


8 posted on 04/01/2012 2:14:26 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

ANY Republican in the White House will be better than what we have. If conservatives refuse to vote for the Republican nominee because he is “not conservative” enough, then they will probably not have to worry about voting in 2016.


9 posted on 04/01/2012 2:16:29 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

I’ll support any Republican over Obama.

I’ll also support just about any Republican in a brokered convention over Romney, and hence support any strategy needed to bring that about.

That’s my stance, and I’m sticking with it until November.


10 posted on 04/01/2012 2:21:47 PM PDT by Yossarian ("All the charm of Nixon. All the competency of Carter." - SF Chronicle comment post on Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun
Mark would have voted for Rick Santorum but the GOP establishment/Mitt Romney fix was in that had only the Mendacious Massachusetts Mittens and The Nut on the ballot in Virginia.
11 posted on 04/01/2012 2:24:29 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("Rick or Mitt take your pick.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Obama winning a second term is the reason..

Even Breitbart, in his last speech, said that he would rally around whoever gets the nomination.

We are all Breitbart now.


12 posted on 04/01/2012 2:24:41 PM PDT by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Never.

Will not vote the enemy into my own camp.

Santorum 2012


13 posted on 04/01/2012 2:30:57 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Isn’t the real question how we can get conservative, tea-party, people into the many House and Senate seats that are available, this year, with this a$$ at the top of the ticket?

I could pull the lever in the booth for him, given Zero as the alternative, but I would do ABSOLUTELY nothing else for his campaign. He won’t win, anyway, but he is going to sabotage a lot of good candidates in the House and Senate.

I think that this is his purpose.


14 posted on 04/01/2012 2:32:18 PM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Romney will be WORSE than Obama re-elected.

BOTH GIVE THE SAME THING.

But Obama will be impeached immediately.


15 posted on 04/01/2012 2:32:31 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat
ANY Republican......he is “not conservative” enough,

Mitt isn't even a R - where are you getting " not conservative enough" from? The GOP E, the media!! You ate their propaganda - don't regurgitate it here!!

Now tell me what is Republican about this....
PRO HOMO, PRO ABORTION, anti traditional marriage, appointment of liberal judges, anti gun, BIG Gov't socialistic heathcare.

That's Mitt's record - LIBERAL - all the way! And add that MA, under his admin, was 47 in the nation for unemployment!

He's a snake in the grass POS FRAUD to represent himself as an R. He's got nothing to prove it - and him saying he is - I'll add, he is a KNOWN LIAR.

16 posted on 04/01/2012 2:32:41 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

mark


17 posted on 04/01/2012 2:33:12 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Pray for our republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Obama winning a second term is the reason..

Obamney IS Robama's second term.

If the GOPe succeeds in shoving Dole III down our throats the GOP party will be sleeping with the Whigs.

I'll write in Sarah or Newt, or vote Constitution Party or even Libertarian. My advice to anybody who suggests rallying around Obamney is to GFYS.

18 posted on 04/01/2012 2:33:36 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (Sofa King Mitt Odd Did Obamneycare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

“ANY Republican in the White House will be better than what we have. If conservatives refuse to vote for the Republican nominee because he is “not conservative” enough, then they will probably not have to worry about voting in 2016.”

“Not conservative enough” implies not settling for a flawed candidate who has some redeeming qualities.

Romney is a Dem Trojan horse trying to take over the Pubs from the inside.

Romney’s dad was a student and supporter of Saul Alinsky.

Socialism is bad, whether it has a D or an R by it’s name.

We’ve got to TRY to stop him in the primaries.


19 posted on 04/01/2012 2:47:12 PM PDT by redinIllinois (Pro-life, accountant, gun-totin' grandma - multi issue voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

Not only would Romney be Obama’s second term, it’d be a second term without any Republican resistance.


20 posted on 04/01/2012 2:50:23 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson