Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Elana Kagan violates the law!
Self ^ | 3/29/2012 | Self

Posted on 03/29/2012 7:11:42 PM PDT by Bigun

According to Section 455(b)(3) of Title 28 of the U.S. Code, justices must disqualify themselves in cases where they have “served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser, or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case or controversy.”

As solicitor general of the United States, Justice Elena Kagan served as the head of an office responsible for formulating the Obama administration’s legal defense of its domestic agenda priority — Obamacare.


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: justice; kagan; kaganobamacare; kaganrecuse; law; violates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Bigun

Just tossing this out there... What if she waits until the conference vote on Friday, and as the most junior (?) Justice she votes last, she says, “Because of my involvement in the administration’s construction of the law, I am recusing myself.”

I almost think she may do this, especially if she sees that the vote is going clearly either for or against Obamacare, and that her vote isn’t needed. If all the other justices’ votes show a clear decision for or against the bill, she can recuse herself, saving her loss of legitimacy for another day and showing that she isn’t what we all think she is.

If, however, the vote is tied, I fully expect she will vote to save the bill, and ethics be damned; thus, our opinion about her will be proven.


21 posted on 03/29/2012 7:44:00 PM PDT by onemiddleamerican (FUBO and all your terrorist buddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henbane

that made me snort so hard I believe I’ll have a nosebleed. Congressional Geldings...... new name for Republicans; how apt.


22 posted on 03/29/2012 7:48:23 PM PDT by Segovia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: onemiddleamerican
What if she waits until the conference vote on Friday, and as the most junior (?) Justice she votes last, she says, “Because of my involvement in the administration’s construction of the law, I am recusing myself.

”To late!

She has already actively participated in oral arguments and needs to have articles of impeachment drawn up against her RIGHT FREEKING NOW!

23 posted on 03/29/2012 7:56:59 PM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

What legal recourse is there against a SC justice? Anyone know?


24 posted on 03/29/2012 8:00:12 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

Because politicians - Democrat and Republicans - care more about their jobs than about our country.


25 posted on 03/29/2012 8:02:11 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
What legal recourse is there against a SC justice? Anyone know?

Yes! Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors!

26 posted on 03/29/2012 8:02:58 PM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Congressman Alcee Hastings form South Florida was once a federal judge but was impeached for taking bribes. I can and should be done in this case as well!


27 posted on 03/29/2012 8:05:21 PM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Because politicians - Democrat and Republicans - care more about their jobs than about our country.

Then we very definitely need some new politicians!

28 posted on 03/29/2012 8:09:02 PM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

Agree - wonder if anyone has the cojones to actually start the process....


29 posted on 03/29/2012 8:19:26 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

30 posted on 03/29/2012 8:23:26 PM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Agree - wonder if anyone has the cojones to actually start the process....

I doubt it unless WE stand up on our hind legs like MEN and DEMAND that it happen!

31 posted on 03/29/2012 8:30:08 PM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

Exactly!


32 posted on 03/29/2012 8:31:23 PM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick

“who can force her to do what’s right?”

Congress.


33 posted on 03/29/2012 8:36:08 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“What legal recourse is there against a SC justice? Anyone know?”

It’s called “impeachment.”


34 posted on 03/29/2012 8:39:28 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick

If Republicans get a significant majority in Congress she should be impeached. But were that to occur, would the leadership have the stones to do it? Heck no.


35 posted on 03/29/2012 8:40:25 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

MISTRIAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


36 posted on 03/29/2012 8:40:25 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Where is John Roberts on this? He should read the law to the stupid liberal.


37 posted on 03/29/2012 8:49:26 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

Bump.....


38 posted on 03/29/2012 8:58:46 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Sad to say, this comes down to another race issue.

Appointed by the first black President. Who is going to vote impeachment? Nobody.

39 posted on 03/29/2012 9:04:08 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Obama has NEVER given a speech where he did not lie!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick

Roberts could force her to recuse.


40 posted on 03/29/2012 9:19:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson