This is just a small example of what the Left has on Santorum. And they are actually holding back, since there is a real an concerted effort on their side to get Santorum nominated. They have been pranking the primaries in several Open states to do just that. Michigan, Alabama, Mississippi, and any open state for that matter.
I understand your trying to defend Santorum, but what is in store for our side if he gets the nomination, will prove to be a disaster. I firmly believe that.
As far as Newt's record, that is not necessary. Newt's record speaks for itself. His personal issues should not be a factor, but many here have made the primary factor.
On the other hand, all this blind support for a candidate who can do no wrong, when he is not at all, what he is being promoted as being, is why I go out of my way to present facts that prove otherwise.
Oh, spare me again. They have it on all of the candidates. What they don't have, they will make up, as they did with this headline. And they will twist themselves beyond recognition against any GOP candidate - they will attack Newt for sitting on that loveseat with Pelosi when they applauded it when it happened. That's just one example.
FR should stand for exposing and tearing down liberal hatchet jobs, not giving them veracity by picking them up and using them against the other guy.
The Santorum camp belives the same to be the case about Newt. And the GOP-E believes that about both men. Personally, I think a ham sandwich could beat Obama the way things are going.
Your beliefs about Santorum's electability does not justify using old left-wing attacks against him. We should condemn all such crap, instead of picking up the liberal hatchet jobs and using them.