Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dandiegirl

There were 2 different kinds of threats: the threat that Soros made to the media company, and the threats that the media company made to the on-air personalities in order to get the “little people” to serve the companies’ interests.

Soros threatened to wipe out the media company, although if the media company had reported the threats before the election, that Soros threat would be a vain one unless Soros had some way of guaranteeing that Obama would get the White House (and thus be able to control the FCC and FTC) even if the threats were reported. I suspect that Soros had some other threat over the media companies as well, and that it may have been a threat to make another run on the bank and collapse the world economy.

In any event, the media companies told their employees that if they reported on the eligibility issue or allowed anybody on their shows to do so, it would mean the end of their career and the implication was made loud and clear that their lives and their families’ lives were questionable.

So it’s not just Soros who might kill the offending person/people, but the actual media company, in order to stay in the good graces of Soros and/or to prevent him from carrying out whatever his real threat was. IOW, a hit man might come from Soros, or might be hired by Fox. It’s the ultimate psy-op: make sure the reporters don’t know whether the very people they are working with can be trusted. It’s the same psy-op Obama’s online “plants” have been doing to eligibility researchers from the very beginning: poisoning the well so we have no idea who we can trust.

In the case of somebody like Breitbart Soros wouldn’t have that middle man (the media company) to do the dirty work so it would have to be done by his own people (how convenient that he’s got his puppet in the White House so he has a full arsenal of CIA and covert military technology at his disposal,...)

The bigger question is what you’re getting at, though, and it’s a good one. How do we defeat this diabolical plan? Part of that depends on what the real threat was, that Soros made to the media companies - and who else he made the same threat to. For instance, if he threatened not only the media heads but also CONGRESS with another run on the bank, Black riots, etc, then their willingness to take up the issue depends on whether they can defend the country from whatever the threat is.

That’s also why it’s so awful that we’ve got Janet Napolitano and Eric Holder guarding the henhouse... We’re having to prance naked in order to go on an airplane (in order to make us THINK we’re secure) but our borders are wide open with a “Kick Me” sign on it inviting in the drug cartel-Hezbollah alliance on our southern border (and, as I understand it, Hamas operatives on our northern border). At the same time we’ve got practically nobody left to defend us here, since our soldiers, money, and ammunition are being bled out in Afghanistan - a theater nobody has ever been able to win in, which Obama switched to after snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in Iraq.

Right now it seems to me that we know the country has been taken hostage by Soros. The next step, IMHO, needs to be to figure out exactly who he’s got hostage and what he’s holding against them. When we know that we can figure out how to disarm him, if possible.

If it’s just the safety of the reporters, put them all in a witness protection program and arrest Soros immediately. There IS safety in numbers, and exposing the diabolical plan before it can be successfully executed means that when it is attempted it will immediately be seen as proof that what was exposed was true.

If it’s the threat of black riots, we need to get our troops back home NOW so they can defend the homeland. And we need patriots to buy guns and ammunition so that if the troops are not back in time we can defend ourselves from either riots or a Hezbollah coup. Maybe training in how to disburse riots would be good.

When SCOTUS was waffling all the eligibility stuff before and immediately after the election, I mentioned to a military guy I’m friends with that SCOTUS might be held hostage by the fear of race riots. He said the military has ways to disburse riots and could immediately take over every major city if the need arose; he believed we had the personnel and weaponry to take care of even nationwide rioting if necessary. And Bush was still CINC then so there was still presumably the will to defend and protect the country. He didn’t think we needed to fear race riots. He also believed that Colin Powell had endorsed Obama in exchange for access so he could keep an eye on things and make sure Obama never got power/information he can’t be trusted with. I think there’s probably a lot more to a lot of stories than we know now but I don’t know what.

I should talk with him again and see if he still feels the same way, given the current level of military personnel in the homeland.


131 posted on 03/13/2012 8:47:41 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

Thanks. Bookmarked.


148 posted on 03/19/2012 7:49:13 PM PDT by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson