Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: parksstp

If you think calling Gingrich “Romney’s Stalking Horse” and accusing his supporters of being for Romney is the best way to win people over to Santorum, I think you are mistaken and doing Santorum a disservice.


23 posted on 03/11/2012 6:10:03 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman; Steelfish

Where do you think I got the idea from? Why don’t you take a look at all the Anti-Santorum comments from people in your camp. You people dish it out, but can’t take it when fire is returned.

For that matter, I put up with the same people worshipping Newt calling Bachmann and Cain stalking horses for Romney as well.

The only difference with me calling Newt a stalking horse for Romney is that I have mathematical proof that supports the point. With the anti-romney’s split in the south and unable to get a majority, Romney is assured at least a 1/3 of the delegates in each southern state. Add this to his already favorable states where Santorum can’t get a clean one on one with him, and Romney is all but certain to have the 1,144 delegates he needs by the time the convention rolls around.

Because of the Newt people here, I’d rather go have a root canal than support such an arrogant, pompous, egotistical maniac.

Many of you are also hyprocritical. If the tables were reversed and Rick was only winning in the South and Newt was second strongest outside all the other states, you’d be screaming for Rick to get out and calling him a stalking horse.


24 posted on 03/11/2012 6:20:18 PM PDT by parksstp (I pick RIck! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson