BREAKING! SUNAHARA V. HDOH DISMISSED

Unfortunately, the Judge ruled in favor of the State and effectively dismissed the Complaint.

Personally, I believe that this could be the result of the immense poisoning of vexatious and incompetent litigation that has plagued the Hawaiian court system, as this case should have been very easily won--if nothing but the law were considered. What other motivation could a state have for denying someone a photocopy of his deceased sister's original birth certificate? Developing . . .

I think it’s very similar to Georgia: the case could be appealed to the state Supreme Court, but they’re not going to rule against Obama. And they all know this is about Obama.

It’s more blatant - because there’s no interpretation necessary to know that no burden of proof is met when no evidence is presented, and that a document not forbidden for release has to be disclosed as allowed by law - but the judiciary has been wiping its bottom on the rule of law on the eligibility issue from Day One. And as long as the judiciary is willing to ignore the law, there’s nothing we can do about it within the legal system. At least not in time for this issue.

That’s why this has always been about the rule of law and not about Obama at all. If judges are able to ignore laws, procedures, precedents, etc, then ANYTHING could be ruled. If bureaucrats are able to make up whatever rules they want, ignore any rules they want, alter records at will, lie at will (as Holder wants government to be able to do in response to records requests), destroy records that are required to be stored permanently, refuse to look the right place for documents they have, and refuse to answer questions, requests, subpoenas, etc, then there is no assurance that ANY records or processes are genuine.

Thanks for the address.

After checking around and finding nothing, I think we’ll have to send the TP on our own.

One for Nishimura, one for Malihi. I’ll wait and see what the Georgia Supreme Court does with the Discretionary Appeal.

The only way to compel discovery of ANYTHING is through a FEDERAL subpoena. That’s why the only way for us to have any semblance of the rule of law is by having Congress appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate and prosecute the crimes committed in regards to Obama’s official records.

Can anyone who is currently empaneled on a Federal Grand Jury issue a subpoena for Mr. Obama’s records?

The brother is trying to get a copy of his deceased sister's birth certificate, which is perfectly legal by EVERY rule that Hawaii has. Yet, they refuse to give it to him.

Some speculate that Hawaii is refusing because Obama's grandmother used the deceased baby's birth certificate number for her grandson's (Obama) falsified records, and Hawaii can't let the truth get out. Therefore, they are trampling on the brother's legitimate rights to access his sister's records as a part of the cover-up.

-PJ

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.