People who knew him, like Hannity said they knew he had a heart problem a year ago.
I find it odd that he posted on twitter the day that he died on a blackberry. His final post was on an ipad. Did he have an ipad in his possession when he died.
I don’t want to be a stickler, but considering the fact that media people including “conservatives” like Hannity, were all threatened not to touch the eligibility issue several years ago they are therefore not trustworthy. If they will refuse to touch issues due to threats, so they could easily say something due to threats or “hints”.
What is needed is an article posted BEFORE his death stating that he had heart problems.
But his own father-in-law didn’t know anything about it? The story out now is that he was hospitalized for 2 weeks after having a heart attack within this past year. But that doesn’t jive with his father-in-law knowing nothing about heart problems and the coroner’s office saying he hadn’t seen a doctor in over a year.
IOW, we’ve got discrepancies that the author of this piece didn’t even mention - probably because he didn’t see the Reuters report of the statements by Bean and the coroner’s office. If the story is fishy to this author even without the discrepancies, then what must it be when you also consider the discrepancies?
The Soros people have threatened the media if they reported on Obama’s eligibility. In order to reiterate the seriousness of the threat the day of Arpaio’s presser - and to stop Breitbart’s revelations, whatever they were (and we know he spoke with Arpaio several hours before he was killed) - the hit had to have plausible deniability built into it so nobody would get caught but it also had to be perceived by the media as an assassination. The precise timing of it is what accomplished that.