[ilgipper]

I think you have your head in the sand. "For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy."<\i> What does this say? 40 percent of females at her school, where she pays a high tuition cannot survive financially because they have to pay for a drug they take by choice. Therefore it must be covered under their health care. Of course, they will not want to pay more for their insurance so someone else is paying for it. She carefully adds 'like me" to make it personal so she is clearly creating the image that she is suffering along with the rest of the poor law students. This whole statement read at this faux hearing is typical liberal claptrap. It is filled with falsehoods, half truths and constructed to say exactly what I originally stated. She is saying 'poor me, my tuition is high, I can't pay for this optional drug, so someone else has to.'

[Scoutmaster]

I think you have your head in the sand.

You wrote: "Her testimony said she paid some huge amount for tuition."

I said she never mentioned her tuition in her statement.

You said you listened to her statement.

I said "I'd respectfully suggest you've confused what you heard on Rush Limbaugh" with what Fluke said, because she didn't mention tuition. I gave you the quote from Limbaugh and the link.

You say I have my head in the sand. That's quite possible. I agree with you that her statements were carefully crafted liberal nonsense. However, she never made any statement about her tuition, and that was the point of the discourse between the two of us. I don't want you to be embarrassed if you try to tell liberal friends that Fluke talked about her tuition, because she never mentioned it. Rush Limbaugh did.