Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ilgipper
I think you have your head in the sand.

You wrote: "Her testimony said she paid some huge amount for tuition."

I said she never mentioned her tuition in her statement.

You said you listened to her statement.

I said "I'd respectfully suggest you've confused what you heard on Rush Limbaugh" with what Fluke said, because she didn't mention tuition. I gave you the quote from Limbaugh and the link.

You say I have my head in the sand. That's quite possible. I agree with you that her statements were carefully crafted liberal nonsense. However, she never made any statement about her tuition, and that was the point of the discourse between the two of us. I don't want you to be embarrassed if you try to tell liberal friends that Fluke talked about her tuition, because she never mentioned it. Rush Limbaugh did.

147 posted on 03/06/2012 6:11:11 AM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

The first article I read on this subject mentioned that Ms. Fluke resented that some were suggesting that she choose another school that is more affordable and would allow for her or other females to attend law school AND have insurance that would cover birth control. She said she should not have to compromise on the quality of law school. It was very insulting to all those hard working lawyers who did compromise because they could not afford otherwise. This was before Rush jumped on the poor innocent virgin who wants a Catholic university to cover birth control pills as well as sex change operations.


148 posted on 03/06/2012 6:20:24 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson