Posted on 03/03/2012 7:02:42 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
Just a day after Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Apaio presented proof the birth certificate presented by Barack Obama as proof he meets Constitutional eligibility to be president is a fraud, we have a story coming out of Hawaii that may provide problems for Obama.
Jerome Corsi writes:
Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
“During the course of my employment,” Adams swears in the affidavit (viewable in full as part 1 and part 2), “I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama’s long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate.”
As he inquired about the birth certificate, he says, his supervisors told him that the records were not on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.
“Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health,” Adams’ affidavit reads, “and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government.”
So, which is it scumbag?
Political parties have a process to pick names for primary ballots (detailed in O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193 and §21-2-191).
The question was whether the SoS has jurisdiction over that process (through O.C.G.A. §21-2-5).
The answer is no for both cases.
ZOT
Like with a theft. Theft is the just the base charge. It is then considered if it is one of many forms of theft, like aggravated theft if a weapon was involved.
Maybe not the best analogy, but it'll suffice.
The first law has to apply for the other to be considered.
Not tracking your hours but watching you like a Hawk, as are others... troll.
The question was whether the SoS has jurisdiction over that process (through O.C.G.A. §21-2-5).
Really! Well maybe you better show me that specific text.
Here is the link again to help you along...Farrar-Welden-Powell-Swensson v Obama, Order Granting Respondent Barack Obama's Motion(s) to Dismiss, Fulton County Superior Court, 3-2-2012
We do know that he doesn’t sleep between 6am and 9pm EST. So, unless he sleeps at work...
The judge is saying the laws are not related
One set of laws governs how political parties pick who is on the primary ballots.
The second law does not applied to primary ballots but only to candidates on the general ballot.
In other words, the plaintiffs did not have legal recourse to the law they filed their complaint under.
Or I don’t work days. Or I don’t work a Monday thru Friday work week. Or due to extensive overseas travel I get a lot of comp time when at home. All apply or have applied to me.
The entire world, but especially the military, doesn’t work a traditional 9-5 job.
Though I've stated before that I personally wanted him to stick around over concerns that he would come back as a retread I would submit to an authoritarian ruling.
I wouldn't really have much choice in the matter though, would I.
I don't run this place, I just visit.
It would be nice to be IBTZ for a change. LOL
In other words, the plaintiffs did not have legal recourse to the law they filed their complaint under.
Why is that?
This is the copy I am using. Look on page 4.
http://libertylegalfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/GA_Obama_Dismissal.pdf
Because Duke v Cleland says that the SoS has no jurisdiction over presidential primary ballots.
She conclude that one was not applicable because legal precedent says it was not applicable.
There were two other options - they are there for a reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.