[Harlan1196]

Political parties have a process to pick names for primary ballots (detailed in O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193 and §21-2-191).

The question was whether the SoS has jurisdiction over that process (through O.C.G.A. §21-2-5).

The answer is no for both cases.

[rolling_stone]

ZOT

[philman_36]

Does one law take precedent over the other?
In other words, does one law have to be applied or be applicable before the other can take place?

Like with a theft. Theft is the just the base charge. It is then considered if it is one of many forms of theft, like aggravated theft if a weapon was involved.
Maybe not the best analogy, but it'll suffice.

The first law has to apply for the other to be considered.

[philman_36]

Political parties have a process to pick names for primary ballots (detailed in O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193 and §21-2-191).
I agree.

The question was whether the SoS has jurisdiction over that process (through O.C.G.A. §21-2-5).

Really! Well maybe you better show me that specific text.
Here is the link again to help you along...Farrar-Welden-Powell-Swensson v Obama, Order Granting Respondent Barack Obama's Motion(s) to Dismiss, Fulton County Superior Court, 3-2-2012