After reading the whole article, etc., I wish to submit a few personal thoughts. I know very little about Ms. Taitz. She may be as crazy as the proverbial “outhouse rat” for all I know. But she HAS actually been lodging legal challenges to Obummer’s eligibility. That’s more than Klayman has done!
For years now, I have received occasional financial appeals from the Klayman organization, touting what all they were doing and “planning to do” to set the Nation aright once more.
I may have overlooked something, but to my knowledge, Klayman’s outfit has not done squat to ACTUALLY make a legal challenge to Obummer in any form or fashion; and precious little else, either! The name of the outfit: LEGAL WATCH, to my mind, is an accidentally accurate name. So far, all they seem to have done is sit on the sidelines and WATCH!
A brief excerpt from the Klayman rebuttal to Taitz is very telling in light of the fact that after 3 years of the Obummer regime, they have still DONE NOTHING! Here’s the excerpt, and I rest my case upon it.....
“Klayman is planning strategy, researching statutes and looking for appropriate jurisdictions to file additional complaints in.”
IMHO, if they haven’t gotten their act together yet after 3 years, and are still “planning strategy”, etc., the chances of them EVER ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING CONCRETE are slim and none. And “Slim” just rode out of town....that leaves NONE!
Thank you for your insights. This is exactly why I posted this.
I myself have donated to Orly in the past, and with the level of vitriol being thrown around amongst some of the principal actors (including by her) in the eligibility challenge drama, I was hoping to get the opinions of varied folks on not only who they believe have been and are doing the heavy lifting, but also which parties and tactics would appear to have the best chance of success in getting to the truth. That is, after all, the whole point, is it not?
There was a lot of dicussion and questioning of motives/motivations in the comments section of the ORYR piece, and I was hoping to get a likely more cogent string of opinion here, where comments don't start with "Anonymous" as they so often do at ORYR.