To: jmstein7
but 2012 is not the year of the Social Conservative.
Gee, that's funny, neither was 2008.......or 2000......
4 posted on
02/22/2012 3:02:16 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: cripplecreek
Geez, you must be young to not remember that the year 2000 was all about the ‘Compassionate Conservative’... aka: Bush the Younger.
41 posted on
02/22/2012 3:36:59 PM PST by
gogogodzilla
(Live free or die!)
To: cripplecreek; Impy; SierraWasp; calcowgirl; BlackElk; American Constitutionalist
Same old drumbeat, different drummer...
You So-Cons just don't get it!! A strong social conservative CANNOT win! You will scare away the MODERATE SUBURBAN MOMS we need to WIN! This election is all about FISCAL ISSUES! The MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE is the economy and only OUR candidate has the credentials to WIN on THAT issue! We must ALL unite behind the FISCAL CONSERVATIVE to SAVE America!
You So-Cons just don't get it!! A strong social conservative CANNOT win! You will scare away the MODERATE SUBURBAN MOMS we need to WIN! This election is all about NATIONAL SECURITY! The MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE is the WAR ON TERROR and only OUR candidate has the credentials to WIN on THAT issue! We must ALL unite behind the NATIONAL SECURITY CONSERVATIVE to SAVE America!
71 posted on
02/22/2012 3:59:19 PM PST by
BillyBoy
(Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson