You have no case.
Therefore, no reasonable, knowledgeable attorney will help you.
None of you know what you are talking about, but you insult and flame anyone who tries to point out how futile and ridiculous you look!
“It is an established maxim, received by all political writers that every person owes a natural allegiance to the government of that country in which he is born. Allegiance is defined to be a tie, that binds the subject to the state, and in consequence of his obedience, he is entitled to protection… The children of aliens, born in this state, are considered as natural born subjects, and have the same rights with the rest of the citizens.”
Zephaniah Swift, A system of the laws of the state of Connecticut: in six books, Volumes 1-2 of A System of the Laws of the State of Connecticut: pg. 163,167 (1795)
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_2_2s6.html
The following is an enormous list of legal citations, from Obama operatives, but you need to know what you are up against:
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/natural-born-quotes/
James Madison, The Founders’ Constitution Volume 2, Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2,
Madison:
It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be unnecessary to investigate any other.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/79655719/James-Madison-on-Contested-Election-Citizenship-And-Birthright-22-May-1789-House-of-Representatives
Loosen your kneepads, obamanoid.
Answer these questions, please:
1. Did anyone prove Obama’s eligibility in the Irion case? If so, what probative evidence of eligibility was entered into the record?
2. Did anyone prove Obama’s eligibility in the Hatfiled case? If so, what probative evidence of eligibility was entered into the record?
3. Did anyone prove Obama’s eligibility in the Taitz case? If so, what probative evidence of eligibility was entered into the record?
4. If any of these attorneys had entered into the record the online Kenyan birth certificate and it remained uncontested by Obama since he and his attorney both showed contempt for the court and didn’t even show up, would Malihi have HAD to accept it as probative? Why or why not?
5. Why did Malihi ignore both Hatfield’s motion to have the burden of proof determined, and all the attorneys’ motions to have Malihi certify the record so that a different judge could decide whether Obama and his lawyer were guilty of contempt of court? If Malihi was negligent on those things, why should we trust that he acted in good faith in ANY of his dealings?
Let’s skip the childish taunts and just get down to the facts of this case. I’ve cited the statutes, rules of evidence, etc, and the only argument your “side” seems to come up with is, “You’re stupid.” Really, really childish way of side-stepping the substantial issues.
And after having looked at your profile, I hope you realize that being part of the Republican establishment doesn’t give you a lot of street cred on this issue at all. The R establishment has trampled the Constitution in so many ways it’s not even funny. Politicians are bought and sold just like slaves used to be bought and sold. You may consider it a real winning point that the politicians and judges have mocked and/or ignored this issue, but for those of us who are aware of all the fraud and how complicit our supposed “public servants” are in all the fraud, that fact is just proof that our government needs a good housecleaning.