Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeal of Obama eligibility decision filed yesterday
Coach is Right ^ | 1/17/2012 | Doug Book

Posted on 02/17/2012 9:22:14 AM PST by Oldpuppymax

The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed an appeal with the Georgia Superior Court in the case of Weldon v Obama, one of the three Georgia lawsuits claiming Barack Hussein Obama to be Constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of the United States or to be included on the Georgia ballot. (1)

It is perhaps significant that the very act of filing the appeal was fought by the Superior Court clerk’s office which claimed that an additional $2 fee had not been included with Liberty Legal’s paperwork for the filing of separate motions.

Additionally, the Court Clerk invented numerous excuses to prevent the filing, moving from one to the next whenever it was pointed out by Liberty Legal attorneys that none reflected normal court operating procedure. According to Liberty Legal attorney Van Irion, the clerk’s conduct was, in the course of his entire legal experience, “unheard of.” (2)

As a side note, although the paperwork had been provided some 7 days earlier, the clerk’s office failed to inform Liberty that there was a problem. The clerk simply “sat on the petition” and the filing deadline of TODAY would have been missed had Irion not called to make certain the filing had taken place!

The appeal itself is based upon the claim that the “rights of the appellant [had] been prejudiced because the finding of the Secretary of State (was) affected by…error of law.” (1)

That is, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who approved Judge Michael Malihi’s Administrative Court decision, had done so in spite of (or due to) mistakes of law made by the Judge in deciding the case.

As Irion states in the appeal, the decision of the Judge “not only violates…

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: barackobama; certifigate; eligiblitydecision; libertylegal; michaelmalihi; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-317 next last
To: Harlan1196
Just lay out your arguments.
I can't lay out my argument when you won't answer my questions! You won't even answer a simple question that requires nothing more than a yes or no answer!

Just lay it out and we will come back later...
Who is "we"?

281 posted on 02/19/2012 9:18:10 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

The core of Ankeny is WKA. WKA is the law of the land.

ITS A BAD DECISION WHICH FOLLOWED WITH ANOTHER BAD DECISION

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/


282 posted on 02/19/2012 9:24:27 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
The Wong Kim Ark opinion looks very bad, America.

See 278. Ankeny looks rock hard stupid.

283 posted on 02/19/2012 9:43:39 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

And when you are king you can change things.


284 posted on 02/19/2012 10:02:37 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Didn’t even Ankeny state that Ark wasn’t a NBC?


285 posted on 02/19/2012 10:03:43 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

So you can’t express in your own words why the judge got it so wrong? Not my job to hold your hand and lead you to your own conclusion.

We = you and me. The courts will ultimately decide who is right or wrong between us.


286 posted on 02/19/2012 10:05:32 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

More constitutional scholarship from our favorite professional poker player?

You do know that Leo has no history of actually being a lawyer before he jumped on the birther gravy train, much less a Constitutional scholar?


287 posted on 02/19/2012 10:09:10 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
More diversion. Answer my simple question!

Didn’t even Ankeny state that Ark wasn’t a NBC?
I just can't figure out why you won't directly answer such a simple question.

Are you worried that you're going to get painted into a corner again?

288 posted on 02/19/2012 10:10:27 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
More constitutional scholarship from our favorite professional poker player?
Why don't you address what he has to say instead of making childish, snide personal attacks?
289 posted on 02/19/2012 10:12:20 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Are you stamping your little feet as you order me to answer you? I have the cutest image in my head of my kids when they were little - but I doubt you are cute.


290 posted on 02/19/2012 10:15:26 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
Didn’t even Ankeny state that Ark wasn’t a NBC?

I'm here all week. /lounge lizard

291 posted on 02/19/2012 10:16:51 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
Are you stamping your little feet as you order me to answer you?

I'm not "ordering" you to do anything. I'm requesting that you answer a simple question so that I can continue making my argument...as you requested.

You must first needs answer my question for me to conclude my argument pertaining to this line of questioning.

If you don't want to fulfill my request then simply say so.

I like winning by default.

292 posted on 02/19/2012 10:21:34 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Sure - he is an idiot that has lost every case. His ideas have been rejected in every possible legal venue.

To a normal person this consistent losing streak plus a complete lack of documented legal experience would raise a red flag that perhaps he was not a Constitutional scholar.

Google his name - there is stuff that I would feel uncomfortable posting on this site. Leo has a “colorful” history. If he wasn’t saying what you wanted to hear, you would reject him in a nano-second.


293 posted on 02/19/2012 10:22:42 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

In what world does me not answering a question make your statements true? It simply means I didn’t answer you.

The courts will decide if you are right or wrong. Such things are not decided by two anonymous non-lawyers on the internet.

Instead of playing 100 questions, why don’t you cut to the chase and simply tell us why the judge will be overturned?
You can lay out a coherent argument without me leading you to your conclusion, can’t you?


294 posted on 02/19/2012 10:28:04 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
blah, blah, blah - blah, blah - blah, blah, blah

So instead of addressing what he has to say you continue to be your usual character assassinating self.

@Liar! Character assassin!

295 posted on 02/19/2012 10:28:15 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
In what world does me not answering a question make your statements true?

Which statements?

296 posted on 02/19/2012 10:29:26 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Good point - you have not laid out a coherent statement of what you believe in. You simply respond to anything I write because without me you can’t seem to find your own conclusion.


297 posted on 02/19/2012 10:32:15 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Unfortunately for you, everything I wrote about Leo is true.

You are aware that he has NO documented court cases or legal publications prior to the birther gravy train? How could that be possible with such a great legal scholar?


298 posted on 02/19/2012 10:34:49 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
You can lay out a coherent argument without me leading you to your conclusion, can’t you?
My conclusion is predicated upon your answer so, no, I can't make my final argument until you answer my simple question.

It simply means I didn’t answer you.
So once again, if you don't want to answer my question then say so directly.

Instead of playing 100 questions, why don’t you cut to the chase and simply tell us why the judge will be overturned?
I'm not a prognosticator whereas you seem to think you are.

299 posted on 02/19/2012 10:37:05 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Character assassin!


300 posted on 02/19/2012 10:37:58 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-317 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson