Here’s my take - and this just seems how it works.
You push in a politician who is, for all intents, a social conservative. That politician enacts regulations and laws and enables more and bigger bureaucracies to form. The government workers who are then hired in that new mega-department are almost always leftists and then push to subvert that bigger bureaucracy into a leftist enabling entity. Effectively nullifying the voters intent in the long run.
I myself am super strict in my family - but I see clearly when the government plays the moral parent we just get more and bigger leftism - more powerful immorality. For example, homeland security is now targeting abortion clinic protestors. My argument for less government is that government always ends up pushing the progressive agenda, because most people who want to work for the government are progressives. I wish that weren’t true - but it just is.
I feel we are used like suckers, pushing for a government that we believe will do the right thing - but they never, ever do. So I would rather see their power limited - and at least they won’t use my tax money to pay for every sick thing there is!
Also if we reduce government, it will force the population to grow up and act like adults, and that is always more socially conservative.
I feel we are used like suckers, pushing for a government that we believe will do the right thing - but they never, ever do. So I would rather see their power limited - and at least they wont use my tax money to pay for every sick thing there is!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Agreed. But there is no one on the Libertarian side that has a chance of doing that.