Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldpuppymax

Judge Malihi’s ruling in this case sets a VERY, VERY, VERY bad legal precedent. He has now paved the way in GOLD and PLATINUM for ANY defendant in a legal proceeding to arrogantly ignore the court’s requirements and walk away with a ruling in their favor.

IOW, the rule of law has been turned on its ear because a defendant NO LONGER has to offer ANY testimony or evidence in order to receive a judgement in their favor.

The way that the law operates in the US is predicated not only on the written laws, but the result of legal proceedings that establish precedents for future cases.

In this one proceeding, the judicial system in America has been trashed and completely dismantled.


12 posted on 02/09/2012 9:54:34 AM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DustyMoment

Malihi didn’t need probative evidence because his decision was based entirely on “judge’s knowledge”.

Obama is dependent on a sharia ruling in order to even be on the GA ballot.

There is a pattern emerging recently that confirms reports from earlier. I posted about it at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2843995/posts?page=88#88 .


15 posted on 02/09/2012 10:06:12 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson