Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp

Superbirther seizethecarp “I believe that WKA was correctly decided”

Enlightened us..superbirther. How was it decided correctly? It opened the flood gates.

A country cannot perpetuate itself unless its citizens are born from citizens. A country should desire this for its own survival.


38 posted on 02/04/2012 4:55:16 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot1; Red Steel; rxsid; LucyT; Danae; GregNH
I do not consider myself to be a “superbirther” but rather a truth-seeking fact finder and evidence examiner. It goes back to being a retired CPA and Certified Fraud Examiner who happened to spend six years in court in a custody battle. I had to practically memorize the Texas Code of Civil Procedure (the green and red ones for those years...Texas lawyers will know what I mean)

IMO, the WKA court decided that WKA was a 14A citizen. His parents were “subject to the jurisdiction” of the USA and he was born in the country. WKA was NOT an NBC.

The WKA court cannot be blamed if, subsequently, this decision was twisted first by Ankeny and then by Malihi to declare Barry (with a UK subject father) to be NBC, and, in effect, to also declare Anwar al-Awlaki, an anchor baby who blossomed into a terrorist to be eligible to be POTUS!

I do NOT believe that these distortions are what the WKA court decided. IIRC, Leo Donofrio came around to stating that WKA was correctly decided, once he correctly parsed the NBC language in the Minor holding on the definition of NBC.

50 posted on 02/04/2012 5:40:35 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson