Objection! Assumes facts not in evidence.
IMO, Malihi punted to the fallacious interpretation of WKA concocted by the Ankeny court.
I believe that WKA was correctly decided, but wrongly interpreted by the Ankeny court and by Malihi when they twisted the grammar of the Minor citation in WKA to fit their preconceptions.
The Minor NBC language is like one of those optical illusions where some people instinctively see one image and the rest see an entirely different image. This would be assuming that both sides are honestly declaring what they see.
Minor specifically stated it was NOT trying to give a comprehensive definition of NBC. That is why trying to force the Court to accept it was stupid. The Minor decision SAID they were not going to settle the dispute about the meaning.
How was WKA was correctly decided?
Superbirther seizethecarp “I believe that WKA was correctly decided”
Enlightened us..superbirther. How was it decided correctly? It opened the flood gates.
A country cannot perpetuate itself unless its citizens are born from citizens. A country should desire this for its own survival.