According to NPR via NYT
NEWT leads Mitt 39-32
when FL vote divided per RNC rules!
Pass the word!

Click to Donate to Newt Gingrich
CONTACT FOR RNC: website@nrcc.org
310 First Street
Washington DC 20003
Encourage them to do the RIGHT thing, end the FL fiasco NOW, Play by the rules!
2 posted on
02/04/2012 7:43:38 AM PST by
hoosiermama
(FR Unite... Get active contacting MSM, RNC. etc... freepmail : Mountain Mary.)
To: Hotlanta Mike
Bottom line: The dictator’s thugs got to the judge.
3 posted on
02/04/2012 7:52:32 AM PST by
crosshairs
(Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
To: Hotlanta Mike; LucyT
As posted a plethora of times:!
The unreported and unprecedented meeting with eight out of nine of our most blackest robed at SCOTUS on January 14, 2009, very effectively took care of future court challengers of the NBC issues!!
It trickled down to the lower courts, to State and Municipality officials. Jack Maskel’s memos silenced ALL 535 CONcritters, incl. newly Tea Party elected candidates in 2010. The United States under the usurper and an illegal alien are without any foundational laws = CONSTITUTION!!!
4 posted on
02/04/2012 8:04:31 AM PST by
danamco
(-)
To: Hotlanta Mike
I still suspect that Zer0 lost his citizenship in the move to Indonesia and his CIA connected grammar finessed it back upon his return to the US.
6 posted on
02/04/2012 8:24:33 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: Hotlanta Mike
This speaks volumes about the dishonesty of this article:
“The Court held: For purposes of this analysis, this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny [sic meant Ankeny], he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen.
But there is no evidence before the Court that Obama was born in the United States. The court can only rest its finding of fact on evidence that is part of the court record. The judge tells us that he decided the merits of the plaintiffs claims. But he does not tell us in his decision what evidence he relied upon to consider[] that Obama was born in the United States.”
But the section he refers to is the case where the plaintiffs said that even if born in the USA, Obama was disqualified because of his father. So the judge said, “For purposes of this analysis, this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States....”
The judge was analyzing that PART of the argument, and not trying, in that section, to determine birth location.
7 posted on
02/04/2012 8:24:51 AM PST by
Mr Rogers
("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
To: Hotlanta Mike
So the Judge determined that the birth certificate was real?
I know it was provided by Plaintiffs and BO refused to submit anything. This analysis is very convaluted. The purpose of the testimony was to show the BC was fake. This Judge could have ruled using the coffee mug BO is selling.
What a joke. I hope Sheriff Joe has something but that seems like another string along the masses concept. If he has something,he needs to get it out soon. The Dems are going after Joe and the Repubs are trying their best to ignore Fast & Furious. Any ideas?
8 posted on
02/04/2012 8:43:07 AM PST by
DrDude
(Governor of the 57th State)
To: Hotlanta Mike
Mr. Apuzzo may call Ankeny as "bad law" and I suppose folks can use that phrase as an excuse not to read it or try to understand it. Now another Judge has found the ruling in Ankeny "persuasive." Retired Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O'Connor said that Obama is eligible to be President because he was born in Hawaii. The entire Congress certified the 2008 election. I've read the cases and the history books as much as anybody, and I found not one word in Malihi's ruling that surprised me. Perhaps one might consider the possibility that instead of Ankeny being bad law, Apuzzo has a bad argument. And anyone who thinks a judge is going to be persuaded by Apuzzo is setting themselves up for a disappointment.
9 posted on
02/04/2012 8:45:57 AM PST by
Doc Conspiracy
(Fishing for gold coins in a bucket of mud)
To: Hotlanta Mike
With 6 other states watching this process, I think the whole thing was a set-up from the beginning in order to "bury" the citizenship issue for obama for the upcoming election.
This puts it "on record" that a "judge" has declared obama to be a NBC, and, discourages the other states from following suit.
Another "perfect storm" for the obama people. The fix is in.

13 posted on
02/04/2012 9:05:29 AM PST by
FrankR
(You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
To: Hotlanta Mike
So the Judge set a new legal precedent...you can not show up for court and tell the Judge to f*ck off and still win! Amerika what a country!
Prayerfully, the Georgia SOS has some cajones and ignores the Judge’s recommendation and takes Øbama off the ballot.
17 posted on
02/04/2012 9:48:04 AM PST by
bjorn14
(Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
To: Hotlanta Mike
Since Obama failed to carry his burden of proof as to his place of birth and Judge Malihis decision actually confirms that fact, the Georgia Secretary of State should reject Judge Malihis decision and rule on his own that Obama not be placed on the primary ballot.@ Georgia Secretary of State to Obama Atty Jablonski
Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.
No celebrations quite yet. Just more of the same...continue to distract, continue to try and convince everyone it's pointless and useless to continue 'cause a decision has been rendered.
We'll see what happens next. The ball is in SoS Kemp's court (pun intended) now.
22 posted on
02/04/2012 10:15:00 AM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Hotlanta Mike
23 posted on
02/04/2012 10:16:03 AM PST by
sourcery
(If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
To: Hotlanta Mike
My apologies if I've killed your thread. It's a very good article.
30 posted on
02/04/2012 11:23:28 AM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Hotlanta Mike
As I've repeatedly said, until the 14th Amendment is corrected to mean born owing only one allegiance, and that being to the United States per the 1868 Expatriation Act, all efforts to uphold A2S1C5 are futile. One doesnt clean up manure by spraying the area with deodorizer 1st. Until the manure is taken away, no deodorizer is going to have any lasting affect.
52 posted on
02/04/2012 2:38:18 PM PST by
patlin
("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
To: Hotlanta Mike
Sounds like the judge got “orders from headquarters” to eat his peas.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson