I never received a response from you regarding my comment about seeing through other people’s eyes. (including the riddle of the five hats.)
Did you just not think it worth the bother of reading or did I not explain the idea clearly enough?
I won’t be offended if you tell me it wasn’t worth the bother, because I realize it would require a bit of reading and mulling. Sometimes a shorter message is better, but often you can’t get the point into a shorter message. I’m sure we all know how that is.
I didn’t answer it because it isn’t relevant for me.
This is a court of law.
Aren’t you a Vattel supporter??????
Did it ever occur to you that the lower case in Wong Kim Ark
REJECTED Vattel and so did SCOTUS.
Yes, SCOTUS rejected the Law of Nations as they were slaughtering the 14th Amendment. Can’t figure out how? Read the lower court case.
While everyone goes around crowing about Wong Kim Ark because they don’t understand the case..what they should have been doing is annihilating it because it is one of the worst decisions ever by the Supreme Court AND it made the 14th Amendment LESS restrictive than was the intent by Congress.
The Justices in the dissent understood what was happening and discussed it throughly.
Wong Kim Ark is NOT in your favor. It is not a case that people on this site should be crowing about while they try to prove Obama can’t be President.
I alway Chuckle to myself when I see someone espousing about Vattel who then laud Wong Kim Ark. I suppose most of these people have never read the lower case of Wong Kim Ark.