You need to read this IN DEPTH and comprehend it.
http://www.federalistblog.us/2006/12/us_v_wong_kim_ark_can_never_be_considered/
I agree with Justice Stevens quote:
“A refusal to consider reliable evidence of original intent in the Constitution is no more excusable than a judge’s refusal to consider legislative intent.”
Focus. You’re resorting to very bizarre deflections. Wong Kim Ark considered all kinds of original intent. That’s part of the reason why they concludes that NBCs were EXCLUDED from the 14th amendment. The question, for the third (or is it fourth) time: Why does Gray make a point of emphasizing that Minor’s citizenship was partially due to having citizen parents?? If you don’t want to admit what it means, just say so.