It is not in one sentence and it does not need to be in one sentence. The holding by the Court that Mrs. Minor was a specific type of citizen, that being a natural born citizen, explicitly affirms that her parents were US citizens because, as you posted, the Court declared (and I contend held) that “born in the country to parents who are citizens” is the definition of NBC.
If you can't see the inescapable logic of that all together in context being an affirmation that Mrs. Minor's parents were citizens, then we will have to agree to disagree. In any case, we all will have to await a SCOTUS ruling on what this all means in relation to Barry. We may not have to wait too long!
Do you and Leo not understand that the lower court accepted as true all the material facts and THREW THE CASE OUT.
Citizenship was NOT AN ISSUE .
Right to vote was an issue.
What was before the court????? Not her citizenship because that was already accepted.
The issue before the court was whether a female citizen could vote. Not whether she was a female citizen. That had already been accepted by the lower court.
Both of you should look up the meaning of the word “HOLDING”
Btw, even if the holding was that Minor was an NBC , it is STILL NOT precedent because the issue was not one of her being born of alien parents. She wasn’t born of alien parents. NOT GERMANE TO THE CASE.