Show me the sentence that says her parents were citizens
Show me the “holding” that she was an NBC.
The most basic citizen, natural born, was not entitled to vote if that citizen was a women.
But it is still obiter dictum because citizenship is NOT RELEVANT.
Everyone admitted she was a citizen.
The question before the court was whether a female citizen could vote.
The HOLDING.
NO
While stating that they have to decide the law as it is not as it should be.
M vs H (actual text)
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their
Page 88 U. S. 168
parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. The words “all children” are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as “all persons,” and if females are included in the last, they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact, the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea.
You have to be able to read and comprehend several sentences to understand the ruling. Maybe you should try again more slowly this time.