That you misrepresent the clear meaning of H v M is very telling.
Try to change the subject from that all you want, but it will continue to haunt you.
You are the one that posted the Ankey case. I then posted the excerpt from the Ankey case that states Minor did not decide the issue.
Btw, the definition of NBC was not relevant to the Minor case.
Why don’t you understand that?
Even if they had explicitly stated there was only one definition it still could be stripped away from the case because it was not germane and not part of the case.