Being born to a single mother also removes the obstacle of being born on foreign soil because the “only” legal parent is US Citizen.
However, as a person who got divorced from a common law marriage, and ex tried to have divorce “nullified” to remove the five years back child support he owed and thought (after signing the papers the years earlier and was granted by judge) he would just wave the “BUT WE WERE NEVER MARRRRIIIIEEEDDD” thing around.
The judge told him, “Son, you were common law married by legal definition. You lived together for five years before the common law statute was removed. BUT even if you weren’t common law married, this divorce just made you married. This divorce paper CREATED a marriage.”
Therefore, I contend that Obama’s parents divorce papers will screw up the “born to a single mother so NBC doesn’t matter” argument they are working toward.
And furthermore, how stupid is it to do this crap when he has an entire biography stating otherwise. A biography that for the Obots (when confronted with “we don’t know anything about this guy!”) use as ‘proof’ of his life.
What a Judge thinks in the US does not negate British Citizenship law.
Britain had very complex citizenship laws that were well discussed because of the various countries under their rule.
Kezia’s marriage would be recognized even if there was no official record in some clerks office.
The hitch to this is the theory about Sr being in the US before certain events. I believe it centers on an interview by Sr to a paper. I don’t remember the details.
Your common law marriage was recognized under the law of a US state, so a divorce that your husband agreed to was an admission buy him that he was married.
In the case of BHO Sr. and Ann Dunham if their HI marriage was bigamous, then their “marriage” was a “nullity” (never existed) regardless of any divorce...a divorce that BHO Sr. did not contest nor reply to...so no affirmation by BHO Sr. there!