“Further, unless the marriage was officially recognized as illegitimate under British law”
You are incorrect in your hypothesis if you are indicating that Britain has to do some kind of act to make the marriage illegal. I am the first person that brought up this whole angle of the British law and marriage on this site and have been posting about it for some time.
One of the things that I kept telling the naysayers is that the law was to Obama’s advantage, and if necessary, he would use it .
On the face of the facts as we know them today as presented by Obama and family - Obama was born a bastard under British law...IF there was a marriage to Ann- which I don’t think there was- and IF Sr was married to someone else and not divorced.
Sorry, but the law is not to Obama's advantage. First, he's going to have to produce a verifiable LEGAL record that his father was previously married ... you know, like a legal marriage certificate from Kenya. Personal claims and speculation are NOT going to supercede the alleged Long-Form Birth Certificate showing Stanley Ann OBAMA as the mother and Barack Hussein Obama (SR.) as the father, plus the Dunham-Obama divorce records, Barak Sr. immigration records, HI DOH Index Data, etc. Obama didn't have a copy of his own long form birth certificate until April 2011. How is he going to legally document that his father was previously married by Thursday???? It ain't gonna happen. As far as the law is going to see, Obama's parents were legally married and his father was a British subject when Obama was born. By principles discussed aplenty here and the nationality act that Obama himself has posted STILL at his Fight the Smears site, he is acknowledging himself as a British subject at birth. s advantage. First, he