I know it is not a popular sentiment on a site like this, but it’s still true that even if Iran starts hostilities that too many Americans are still tired of war and the massive debts that have been racked up. By the way, I think Bush did the right thing in Iraq even if there were not WMDs. The no-fly zone thing was a mockery and if Bush hadn’t gone in we’d still be pussy-footing around over there.
I am just trying to understand why the neocon faction needed to be in Iraq if Iraq was not behind 9/11 attacks. Does it mean that the neocon faction run by Karl Rove has a right to grab others’ property? If that is the case, GOP cannot claim the moral high ground. I do not buy the claim about Iran planning 9/11. Iran is Shia. Iraq and Afghanistan were ruled by Sunnis. They hate each other. The RINOs need to stop fooling us in order to grab the property of the rest of the world.
You said “even if there were not WMDs”. Didn’t Saddam possess WMDs, as was stated? (Yes, I know “non compliance” was the key).