I am just trying to understand why the neocon faction needed to be in Iraq if Iraq was not behind 9/11 attacks. Does it mean that the neocon faction run by Karl Rove has a right to grab others’ property? If that is the case, GOP cannot claim the moral high ground. I do not buy the claim about Iran planning 9/11. Iran is Shia. Iraq and Afghanistan were ruled by Sunnis. They hate each other. The RINOs need to stop fooling us in order to grab the property of the rest of the world.
I’m sufficiently convinced that Iraq was working on nuclear weapons prior to 2003 and I’m also convinced that GWB finished a job that his father really should have finished back in 1991. Iraq was causing problems and that needed to be resolved or else I think we would have seen a nuclear exchange between Iraq and Israel by now. With Iran it is much the same thing. If the USA permits Iran to construct nuclear weapons then I fully expect the Iranians to use them on Israel and to use them to blackmail Europe.
I’d like to see Iran dealt with right now while it’s easier to deal with them, but the reality, like I said, is that most Americans are tired of war and/or tired of the expense of war. Both factions are represented on the conservative side of the argument with the supporters of Ron Paul.
As to the RINO’s like Karl Rove I don’t think they are in this for empire, I think they’re making clever investments and then starting troubles in the world that serve the interests of those investments. It’s just market manipulation on a global scale for them.