Posted on 01/06/2012 11:47:17 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
the fence in Arizona was a huge, hyper-expensive failure also.
I posted an article about it on here a month or so ago.
I know there’s gotta be a way to seal the border but it’s not just ‘build a fence.’ Or some cutesy comment about a moat with alligators.
Rick Perry has given a lot of thought to this problem and even gone to Israel to confer with their border people. He will be the one to solve this problem is anyone can.
Thank you for explaining all that. I didn’t have the patience to do it for the thousandth time.
Yes, that was the implied result of a state’s choice to deport. They must request that the feds take custody and deport the individual.
You are just arguing pointlessly. I will mess with you one more time.
No, you cannot get in-state tuition in Texas. Only Texans can.
However, a number of states have similar programs where children of illegals born here can receive that benefit.
I’m aware of what you said about liberal press, but the DMN does anything possible to discredit Perry and their admission that the program was good for Texas in many ways was contradictory to their usual positions.
You called my attempts to explain the fence problem weak B.S.
I’m gonna return the favor. Your whole post (which you seemed to think cleverly refuted everything I was kind enough to attempt to explain to you) was weak B.S.
Perry supporters don’t worship him, we had that with Cain supporters.
With Perry supporters we love, respect and admire the man not only for his personal virtues but for his consistent conservatism and for the way he has led Texas into remaining a prosperous growing economy when so many states are faltering.
No, you still couldn't get in-state tuition in Texas as the child of an illegal. Those children must attend Texas schools for three years immediately preceding their application for in-state tuition.
But you could move to Texas and reside here one full year to get in-state tuition. 1 year versus 3 years. You get preference over them.
Well ain’t that just grand? Follows the philosophy of “close enough for government work,” now doesn’t it?
Welcome.
Posted on Red State, January 5
“Stop Insider Trading Dead In Its Tracks”
by Rick Perry
http://www.redstate.com/governorperry/2012/01/05/stop-insider-trading-dead-in-its-tracks/
Well, WADR, I can't look away from the man's criticism of Jan Brewer's SB 1070, or his resistance to building a physical border barrier between Texas and Mexico, his views on E-Verify (he seems to favor a rework of the concept, and he may not be wrong, but being opposed to businesses using it when it's been shown to work to a degree presents difficulties), or his intent of granting work visas to those very illegals that flout the very immigration laws that he claims to uphold. Furthermore, Perry's opposition to same-sex marriage is only at the federal level; he is not opposed to states legalizing the practice, which is something he shares (IINM) with Ron Paul. By all means, I wouldn't mind if you explained to me how those are conservative positions; thanks.
My suspicion is towards those who would brand this man’s life, values and issue positions, “liberal”
A. The following persons shall be classified as Texas residents and entitled to pay resident tuition:
1. a person who:
a. graduated from a public or accredited private high school in this state or received the equivalent of a high school
diploma in this state, and
b. maintained a residence continuously in this state for
(i) the thirty-six months immediately preceding the date of graduation or receipt of the diploma equivalent, as
applicable; and
(ii) the 12 months preceding the census date of the academic semester in which the person enrolls in an institution
(Note: An individual who is neither a US citizen nor permanent resident must complete and submit the Affidavit).
Form: http://www.admissions.txstate.edu/future/residency.html
Perfect. Thanks, d.
Thanks for the heads up Buck, I’ll read the thread and catch up.
From The Chicago Tribune Jan. 6
“Why Perry Chose to Keep Running For President”
What changed his mind?
Senior Perry aides, friends and staff members told Reuters that after a restless night, Perry and his staff ultimately decided there were four reasons the campaign should continue.
Most significantly, his team essentially calculated that Rick Santorum, who emerged in Iowa as the leading conservative alternative to former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, isn’t a strong enough candidate to hold that position in future contests.
Perry’s campaign also received calls from supporters in Texas, who urged the governor not to give up. And Perry aides determined that their campaign - more so than those of Santorum, a former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, or former House speaker Newt Gingrich - had the organization and fund-raising abilities to compete with Romney in the South Carolina primary on January 21.
Finally, Perry decided that he did not want to leave the race without competing in South Carolina, a state whose conservative voting base is more in line with his politics than middle-of-the road Iowa or New Hampshire, which will hold its primary on Tuesday
Full Story:
Divert that? I see a fence our our side far more protective than the one proposed. Put a guard houses along it at regular intervals ans each end where the fence attaches to it.
:How’s that fence working out in San Diego? :
All the numbers show a significant drop in crossings from before it was built. Of course, illegals simply “GO AROUND” the unfenced portion of strategic fence.
Which is why we need a full one.
“Rick Perry has given a lot of thought to this problem and even gone to Israel”
Where the fence works very well...
Welcome. I encourage you to copy/paste your good ideas here. I especially like the canals.
To continue from the Water/Ag point earlier...
I live on the Colorado River in AZ. I would recommend you look up info on the pipeline/canal across the Mohave desert built in the 70s/80s supplying water to, in fac, SO Cal itself and everything in it which proves that moving water across a desert/Texas type environment is not that complex a thing to do.
A simple canal can accommodate all the water needs of ag/farms along the border. That argument is a provable non-starter. We have done it for decades. One can’t say we can do it for millions of people in Cali and not in Texas. That just doesn’t work.
Thanks,
Let me gather a couple, edit them and I’ll post shortly.
I am also interested in your thoughts about the flood plain issues we’ve faced thus far with a fence down here and how we could work canals into that scenario.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.