"Basement Bloggers" would be Dr. CON, Foggy-OBots, Zotted FR troll EnderWiggins and et al....
I threw that idea out there a while back before I knew about Bates numbering of the certificates, merely as a possible explanation for the sequence problems, but I wasn't trying to claim it was THE explanation or that I had all the facts. This fellow seems unnecessarily snippy about it.
Next thing you know, Virginia is actually a Charles Calthrop.
Dean sent out a call for this to be cross posted - so I did, also adding the rest of the story of the trip in July 2010 by “Researcher” to Honolulu, where she was the first to contact Duncan and his mother. She (Researcher) also did ALL of the original legwork on the Virgina Sunahara research.
“Most of you know/recall that the Post&Email, and this blog,(myveryownpointofview) did several posts/articles on the research that we did into the Virginia Sunahara angle in July of 2010.
Basically it had been suggested that obama may have usurped a birth certificate number from an infant that had been born, then passed away, within the same time frame that is obama’s birthday. Ala Bill Ayers style. So we tried to look into it while Researcher was in Honolulu.
Long story short, back when our Researcher met Duncan, she did not tell Duncan that we were looking to determine if Virginia’s BC number had been usurped by obama. She had never actually planned to meet the Sunaharas, so that part of the research trip was spur-of-the-moment, and the decision to be overly-cautious was agreed to by all three of us. We felt the delicacy of the situation, and since Researcher was alone, we felt it best and safest to be very limited in the contact with Virginias’ family. And the line of questions.
We had tried several attempts afterwards to engage Duncan, and to have him consider a trip to the Honolulu Dept. of Health to request Virginias’ birth certificate, but he never responded. Because he had never responded, I felt it would be too risky for Researcher to travel back to Honolulu in an attempt to convince Duncan in person. Then WND made a call to Mrs. Sunahara (Duncan’s mother) in mid-May 2011, and she told him flatly that they had no interest in trying to obtain Virginias’ birth documents.
At that point I felt it was likely a lost cause to involve the family.
Then Dean met Duncan, and ......
Ping!!!
Upon closer inspection, we learned that the number assigned to Virginia's birth certificate is 151-1961-01180, and realized that, statistically, that number simply cannot be legitimate.
Now, here's what's wrong with that number: we all know that the last group of numbers on the "certificate" Barack Obama claims is his official record is 10641, and his certificate was supposedly processed on August 8, 1961. We also know that the Nordyke twins were assigned the numbers 10637 and 10638, and their certificates were processed on August 11, 1961. Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate states that it was processed on August 10, 1961, but the number it was assigned is 443 higher than the Nordyke twin whose certificate was stamped with the number 10637.
Virginia's number, 01180, is not 443 higher than the twins number, it is 9457 LOWER. I can only assume the author is comparing 1180 to 637, which is actually a difference of 543, not 443. But in fact the comparison is between 1180 and 10637, a difference of 9457.
If 151-1961-01180 can’t be her real number, whose number is it? What time frame does this number indicate? Who has 151-1961-01179 and 151-1961-01181? When & where were they born?
sfl
This is what I am confused about. Could someone explain please? Let’s say 10641 was really Virginia Sunahara’s birth certificate number. She was born on the 4th. Her certificate was processed on the 10th. The Nordyke twins were born on the 5th (?). Their records were processed on the 11th. Why then are their numbers, 10637 and 10638, lower than the number processed on the 10th? Isn’t this the same problem as with Obama? Am I missing something here?
Thanks!
Boy, there seem to be a lot more suits being filed. Is anyone or any website tracking these in an easy to read listing, and/or etc.? Obama must have increased the size of his legal team and expenses, I would think, to deal with the burgeoning number. Anyone have anything on this?
This is all a bit hard to follow but I don’t think that we can know for sure that the handwritten number 151-61-11080 is real.
I mean if Virginia’s real BC number is 10641 and it was stolen then it’s not too difficult to believe that all the documents BC and DC would be changed to accommodate the fraud.
It would be soooo sweet if Duncan could find the original BC somewhere in his family records. The one that was issued in 1961.
If they were different then the fraud would be obvious and a nice trap to boot.