New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Dept of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara(Virginia' brother)

ObamaRelease YourRecords ^ | Wednesday, January 4, 2012; 5:02 PM

[Red Steel]

Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara
Lawsuit against the Hawaii Department of Health has been filed by Hawaii Attorney Gerald Kurashima on behalf of Duncan Sunahara, Virginia Sunahara's brother. The case has been assigned to Judge Nishimura. Dean Haskins of the Birther Summit will be making a public announcement about this case very soon. Stay tuned for further updates.

The case is listed as follows;

Flashback;
Hawaii Department of Health Funny Business Regarding Virginia Sunahara

Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords -www.BirtherReport.com via butterdezillion.wordpress.com

HDOH Denies Having Birth Record for Virginia Sunahara

Virginia Sunahara was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died the next day. Her death was announced in both theHonolulu Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin. Her name is in both the 1960-64 birth index and 1960-64death index.But when I asked for a non-certified copy of her abbreviated birth certificate the HDOH told me thatthey have no records responsive to my request. On previous requests for other COLB I had been told that I could not get a copy because I did not have a direct and tangible interest. But in this case they flat-out told me they don't have a birth record for Virginia. Even though their birth index says they do.

(See the birth index page at http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/attention-whores-moles-and-morethe-thief/ ).

Either the HDOH lied about having no records for her, or they queried her name and the computer no longer has that record under her name, even though it was under her name when they printed the 1960-64 birth index sometime around March of 2010. What happened to Virginia's birth record? Was the name on it changed to Barack Hussein Obama II so he could have her BC#? The HDOH needs to be audited, to find out what has happened with Sunahara's birth record. Here is the HDOH’s claim that they have no birth record for a girl listed on their birth index:

From: hdohinfo
To: Nellie
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: UIPA Request - non-certified abbreviated BC for Tomiyo
SunaharaAloha Ms. (redacted):We have no records responsive to your request. Hawaii Department of Health Public Information Office staff
Send mail to:State Department of Health
Office of Health Status Monitoring
Issuance/Vital Statistics Section/UIPA Request
Honolulu, HI 97801
hdohinfo@doh.hawaii.gov

Excerpted, more here at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html#comment-form

[Red Steel]

If the suit was filed in the name of Clara - Virginia’s mother - UIPA would require that the HDOH release a photocopy, because Clara’s name is listed on the document in question, and UIPA REQUIRES agencies to disclose records having the requestor’s name on it. I wonder if they can add Clara’s name to the lawsuit. That would change everything from a legal standpoint because it would make the disclosure mandated by UIPA, rather than allowing the wiggle-room of HRS 338-16 (where it gives the HDOH Director discretion to decide what form of reproduction will be used for the “copy”, although actually the requestor has the option of requesting a copy of the document or a copy of the CONTENTS of the document. A computer printout is a copy of the CONTENTS but NOT a copy of the document. If a copy of the document is requested that is what the HDOH is required to give, according to HRS 338-16. But, as somebody mentioned and as we all nauseatingly know already, Hawaii doesn’t need to follow no stinking laws or rules.)

You should pass your thoughts about this to Dean Haskins. Who knows, they may do just that in the near future by adding Virginia's mother to the suit. I think you can get to the players in this lawsuit through the "Kontact button" on the home page at ORYR. The "Kontact button" is on the lower right column about halfway down the page. It looks exactly like this:

The home page - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/

[butterdezillion]

You can run from justice but you can’t hide.

Amen. Let it be so.

[tutstar]

bump

[butterdezillion]

Good idea. My computer is being weird so I wasn’t able to use the contact button but I was able to submit a comment (or at least I hope it got submitted).

[butterdezillion]

It’s scary how fast he’s moving to take over whole chunks of power, against the Constitution. I think he’s thinking the final coup has begun.

[butterdezillion]

That means so much. Please cover in prayer everybody who is working on this issue. There are strong forces at work and we need “Aaron” to hold up our battle-weary arms just like Moses needed. This is absolutely a team effort by lots and lots of good people. And lots and lots of people are opposing the rule of law as well. It is a raging battle between 2 opposing forces - one for the rule of law and the other for lawlessness. Thanks for siding with the rule of law.

[Fred Nerks]

...This is confusing to me because Orly got a copy of the COLB...

That's the first time I heard of that! If she has, has she revealed the number?

[David]

They told me a while back that they don’t have a birth record for Virginia Sunahara. But her name is in the birth index and Taitz has gotten a COLB for her, IIRC. They couldn’t have a COLB without also having SOME kind of original document/BC. So the only way they could explain not having an original long-form BC for her is if they claim it was destroyed.

I had not heard until now that Orly has a COLB for Virginia.

Would the COLB not have a number on it also? Which should be the number of the primary birth file?

Like you and everyone else, I have assumed that the number on zero's most recent "Birth Certificate" is Virginia's.

I don't think they can afford to admit to having a Virginia birth file. But we will see.

[thecodont]

Yes, I've had similar thoughts today about his un-Constitutional actions is related to him getting squeezed over his hidden past.

Trying to steal everything he can before he gets the hook. He'll be dragged off stage with his arms full of ill-gotten goods.

[Hotlanta Mike]

It’s a good bet that Obama uses Virginia’s birth certificate number.

---

One could bet the farm and feel confident about that! The Fraud-in-Chief being hit on many fronts now. Perhaps a wag the dog manuever is in the works.

[Hotlanta Mike]

So was the lawsuit filed post Obama vacay stay in Oahu or during? Maybe the Hawaiian’s are tiring of the imposter.

[Fred Nerks]

http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate

the COLB on fightthesmears STILL shows the original black rectangle.

[bvw]

Maybe. But a con gets a thrill from the risk of con, and when if trouble seeks a bigger risk.

[butterdezillion]

Sigh. My open records identity could not be verified. So I logged in at my blog and it’s still saying it can’t be verified. Either that, or my computer has decided it’s just not going to do anything on that site.

Last time my computer acted this way was right after I began thinking out loud about the possibility that Soros’ communist-Islamist allies had made the run on the bank to get Obama installed and threatened the judges, McCain, GWB, Cheney, the media heads, etc with another run on the bank if they didn’t let the ineligible Obama into office.

Would you be willing to contact them at ORYR with this message from me? If so, thanks. And if not, thanks anyway. =):

A note for Dean Haskins. I posted this at Free Republic and it was suggested that I get this to Dean. Thanks for passing this along!

Nellie
>>>
If the suit was filed in the name of Clara - Virginia’s mother - UIPA would require that the HDOH release a photocopy, because Clara’s name is listed on the document in question, and UIPA REQUIRES agencies to disclose records having the requestor’s name on it. I wonder if they can add Clara’s name to the lawsuit. That would change everything from a legal standpoint because it would make the disclosure mandated by UIPA, rather than allowing the wiggle-room of HRS 338-16 (where it gives the HDOH Director discretion to decide what form of reproduction will be used for the “copy”, although actually the requestor has the option of requesting a copy of the document or a copy of the CONTENTS of the document. A computer printout is a copy of the CONTENTS but NOT a copy of the document. If a copy of the document is requested that is what the HDOH is required to give, according to HRS 338-16. But, as somebody mentioned and as we all nauseatingly know already, Hawaii doesn’t need to follow no stinking laws or rules.)

[chicken head]

why dont she just get the death certificate, it has the BC number and all on it just like a long form?

[butterdezillion]

One of the lawsuits - maybe the GA one that the judge just ordered the HDOH to produce the original BC and microfilm roll for - used as its reasoning the fact that the COLB that Orly received has a BC# that is far out of sequence with other BC’s filed/accepted the same day. Orly hasn’t revealed what the number is; only that it is way out of sequence.

You’d think people would have to wonder why they are so insistent upon hiding the original - for both Obama and for Sunahara. Why would the HDOH refuse to comply with the GA judge’s order if Obama had already disclosed a genuine copy of the original? If everything was on the up and up there would be no reason for the HDOH to be fighting all this - to hide the birth record of a dead child and to hide the birth record of a supposed President who has already supposedly released a scan and photograph of a certified copy?

[hoosiermama]

bump

[Hoosier-Daddy]

I have a queasy feeling Mr. Lapua or Mr. Barrett are coming to pay a visit.

and no, Mr. NSA, it's just a queasy feeling.

[Red Steel]

Your message has been received and forwarded to Mr. Haskins.

[ecinkc]

Butterdezillion, I feel that constitutionalists and those who value the rule of law in this country owe you a great deal of gratitude for all your unsung and tireless efforts to dig and struggle and push for honest and reasonable answers. Whatever the details of this case may include, it seems possible that it may never have come to fruition at all had YOU not pried about everything you could think of in your dealings with the HDOH. You are a hero.

I know there have been many who have, like Donofrio, regarded HDOH’s actions as an elaborate red herring to distract from the fact that Obama was born into dual citizenship. I have continued to think that being a source of distraction is an unlikely motive for all the crazy maneuvering of the HDOH, OIP and SOH. To be honest I find it at least as reasonable a guess that Obama’s fightthesmears.com site openly declared him a dual-born citizen in the hopes that it would create esoteric legal battles over terminological nuances of the Constitution that most Americans would never have the patience to carefully evaluate. Is dual-citizenship the red herring that distracts from something like identity theft or illegal alien status?

Perhaps if he were someone entirely different than who he has claimed to be, he would hope to get his opponents consumed over fine details of whether the person he claims to be is technically qualified to hold the office. Wouldn’t legal battles over “natural born citizen” vs. “born citizen” be preferable to the scandal that would strike if someone were to discover incontrovertible evidence that he wasn’t even Barrack Obama?

If that were the case and even if his true identity were that of a person who meets the strictest criteria for natural born citizen status, the hoax and fraud and perjury of having an ongoing, unrepetant identity thief in the oval office would do roughly as much harm to his administration/career as would be done if the SCOTUS were to uphold their ruling that to be a natural born citizen is to be born in the US to citizen parents.

Thank you for your amazing diligence and sacrifice and perseverance in holding HDOH’s feet to the fire. How can anyone who is astute about their actions conclude that they haven’t been hiding something?

(Not that I have anything against those who are pushing the argument over the meaning of “natural born citizen,” as I do agree that history favors the view that the founders meant to include the parental citizenship requirement. I especially wish all the best to Van Irion and the Liberty Legal Foundation cases given that they seem to have broken major new ground.)