To: Supreme One
I would imagine it would certainly qualify as "supernatural" if it turns out that this sort of thing was supposedly produced using ultroviolet lasers in the Middle Ages -- or some time far earlier than that.
I am familiar with the Shroud of Turin but admittedly don't know enough about all the science behind it to render a fully informed opinion on it . . . but I've long felt that if it is, in fact, the burial shroud of Jesus Christ, then we'll probably learn that the image was produced through some kind of remarkable process that isn't readily explained with all the limitations of the physical world.
5 posted on
12/22/2011 6:53:17 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
To: Alberta's Child
...but I've long felt that if it is, in fact, the burial shroud of Jesus Christ, then we'll probably learn that the image was produced through some kind of remarkable process that isn't readily explained with all the limitations of the physical world.
That's what the article is saying. “We can't duplicate the shroud without lasers.” Which didn't exist before the 50’s. The 1950's.
7 posted on
12/22/2011 7:13:53 PM PST by
Cheburashka
(If life hands you lemons, government regulations will prevent you from making lemonade.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson