Not as bad as initially believed to be!
1 posted on
12/17/2011 11:36:54 AM PST by
appeal2
To: appeal2
Key words are “Not Yet Repealed”. Just as the Supreme Court finally recognizing the 2nd amendment as protecting gun ownership does not mean government isn’t thinking of ways to ban them, so this altered bill doesn’t mean big brother isn’t scheming to shred the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
2 posted on
12/17/2011 11:44:24 AM PST by
RWB Patriot
("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
To: appeal2
If there is potential for abuse, abuse there will be.
3 posted on
12/17/2011 11:49:13 AM PST by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: appeal2
The NDAA is an unlawful “Bill of Attainder”.
Look it up!!
4 posted on
12/17/2011 11:52:55 AM PST by
djf
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
To: appeal2
8 posted on
12/17/2011 1:08:03 PM PST by
Captain7seas
(FIRE JANE LUBCHENCO FROM NOAA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson